[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#300272: marked as done (mailliststat: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): array type has incomplete element type)

Your message dated Fri, 02 Sep 2005 16:04:59 -0700
with message-id <87hdd3ul44.fsf@becket.becket.net>
and subject line Officially fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Mar 2005 18:12:43 +0000
>From aj@andaco.de Fri Mar 18 10:12:43 2005
Return-path: <aj@andaco.de>
Received: from c223012.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DCLxi-0005Yl-00; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:12:42 -0800
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.44)
	id 1DCLxd-0001eF-35; Fri, 18 Mar 2005 19:12:40 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
From: Andreas Jochens <aj@andaco.de>
Subject: mailliststat: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): array type has incomplete element type
Message-Id: <E1DCLxd-0001eF-35@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 19:12:40 +0100
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: mailliststat
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

When building 'mailliststat' on amd64 with gcc-4.0,
I get the following error:

make[1]: Entering directory `/mailliststat-1.3'
gcc -Wall -O3 -g -c mls.c -o mls.o
In file included from mls.c:22:
mls_text.h:33: error: array type has incomplete element type
make[1]: *** [mls.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/mailliststat-1.3'
make: *** [build] Error 2

With the attached patch 'mailliststat' can be compiled
on amd64 using gcc-4.0.

Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/mailliststat-1.3/mls_text.h ./mls_text.h
--- ../tmp-orig/mailliststat-1.3/mls_text.h	2003-02-15 11:16:07.000000000 +0100
+++ ./mls_text.h	2005-03-18 19:05:04.628662941 +0100
@@ -30,7 +30,6 @@
 void PrintTopQ(nTptr, int);
 void PrintTopHtml(nTptr, int);
 void PrintGraph(long[], int, int);
-void PrintGraphHtml(long[], long[][], int, char *);
 void PrintStatText(int, char *);
 void PrintStatHtml(int, char *, short);

Received: (at 300272-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Sep 2005 23:04:59 +0000
>From tb@becket.net Fri Sep 02 16:04:59 2005
Return-path: <tb@becket.net>
Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1EBKah-0004n9-00; Fri, 02 Sep 2005 16:04:59 -0700
Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.52)
	id 1EBKah-0005YD-6f
	for 300272-done@bugs.debian.org; Fri, 02 Sep 2005 16:04:59 -0700
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
To: 300272-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Officially fixed
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute
		 permission for an emailed response.
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51  63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E  EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92
X-Tom-Swiftie: "Who drank the last beer?" Tom asked, hopping mad
Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 16:04:59 -0700
Message-ID: <87hdd3ul44.fsf@becket.becket.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: 300272-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 

Version: 1.3-3

This NMU-fixed bug became closed when QA took over the package.

Reply to: