[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#295147: marked as done (Library package of older version without reverse-depends)



Your message dated Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:56:59 +0200
with message-id <20050818165659.GB5556@diziet.irb.hr>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Feb 2005 23:32:04 +0000
>From jeroen@wolffelaar.nl Sun Feb 13 15:32:04 2005
Return-path: <jeroen@wolffelaar.nl>
Received: from 220pc220.sshunet.nl (mordor.wolffelaar.nl) [145.97.220.220] (Debian-exim)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1D0TDg-0001pX-00; Sun, 13 Feb 2005 15:32:04 -0800
Received: from jeroen by mordor.wolffelaar.nl with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1D0TDf-0007i4-Qp
	for submit@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 14 Feb 2005 00:32:03 +0100
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 00:32:03 +0100
From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <jeroen@wolffelaar.nl>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Library package of older version without reverse-depends
Message-ID: <20050213233203.GA29557@wolffelaar.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.2
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: qt-embedded
Severity: serious

As per [1], this is an older version of qte, and the package has no
reverse-dependencies.

IMHO it's atm unsuiteable for release in a stable Debian.

--Jeroen

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2005/02/msg00005.html

-- 
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
jeroen@wolffelaar.nl
http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 295147-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Aug 2005 16:57:22 +0000
>From mvela@irb.hr Thu Aug 18 09:57:22 2005
Return-path: <mvela@irb.hr>
Received: from mail.irb.hr [161.53.22.8] (UNKNOWN)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1E5nhi-00022y-00; Thu, 18 Aug 2005 09:57:22 -0700
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
	by mail.irb.hr (8.13.3/8.13.3/Debian-6) with ESMTP id j7IGuxHb022230;
	Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:56:59 +0200
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id j7IGuxY4005949;
	Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:56:59 +0200
Received: (from mvela@localhost)
	by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j7IGuxwg005947;
	Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:56:59 +0200
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 18:56:59 +0200
From: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>
To: 243331-done@bugs.debian.org, 249005-done@bugs.debian.org,
        266164-done@bugs.debian.org, 277431-done@bugs.debian.org,
        295147-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <20050818165659.GB5556@diziet.irb.hr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.31
Delivered-To: 295147-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 5

qt-embedded and qt-embedded-free were removed from Debian in March.
Please see <http://bugs.debian.org/300503> for details.



Reply to: