[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#67384: marked as done (fields are too large when looking at individual records)

Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:32:33 +0100
with message-id <20050731223233.GA30728@deprecation.cyrius.com>
and subject line Removed from Debian - unmaintained
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jul 2000 06:47:03 +0000
>From Robert.King@mailbox.gu.edu.au Tue Jul 18 01:47:02 2000
Return-path: <Robert.King@mailbox.gu.edu.au>
Received: from kraken.itc.gu.edu.au [] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 2 (Debian))
	id 13ER9g-0001JT-00; Tue, 18 Jul 2000 01:47:01 -0500
Received: from solzhenitsyn.ens.gu.edu.au (solzhenitsyn.ens.gu.edu.au []) by kraken.itc.gu.edu.au (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA24994 for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 18 Jul 2000 16:47:44 +1000 (EST)
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2000 16:48:09 +1000 (EST)
From: Robert.King@mailbox.gu.edu.au
X-Sender: king@solzhenitsyn.ens.gu.edu.au
Reply-To: Robert.King@mailbox.gu.edu.au
To: Debian Bug tracking system <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: fields are too large when looking at individual records
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10007181643220.8835-100000@solzhenitsyn.ens.gu.edu.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: bibview
Version: 2.2-3
Severity: wishlist

Using bibview on a 1024x768 screen, when looking at individual records
the fields for author, date, etc. are far too large.  An example window
screenshot is at


Once userdata is added, the window gets so big it doesn't fit on the screen.

Could bibview be fixed so that these fields are a more reasonable size?

My window manager is fvwm, Version: 2.2.4-2

Thanks for the great distribution!


depends on:
||/ Name           Version        Description
ii  libc6          2.1.3-10       GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii  xlib6g         3.3.6-7        shared libraries required by X clients

X display info is:

name of display:    :0.0
version number:    11.0
vendor string:    The XFree86 Project, Inc
vendor release number:    3360
maximum request size:  4194300 bytes
motion buffer size:  256
bitmap unit, bit order, padding:    32, LSBFirst, 32
image byte order:    LSBFirst
number of supported pixmap formats:    2
supported pixmap formats:
    depth 1, bits_per_pixel 1, scanline_pad 32
    depth 24, bits_per_pixel 32, scanline_pad 32
keycode range:    minimum 8, maximum 134
focus:  window 0x1c00014, revert to Parent
number of extensions:    19
default screen number:    0
number of screens:    1

screen #0:
  dimensions:    1024x768 pixels (260x195 millimeters)
  resolution:    100x100 dots per inch
  depths (1):    24
  root window id:    0x25
  depth of root window:    24 planes
  number of colormaps:    minimum 1, maximum 1
  default colormap:    0x21
  default number of colormap cells:    256
  preallocated pixels:    black 0, white 16777215
  options:    backing-store YES, save-unders YES
  largest cursor:    64x64
  current input event mask:    0x7a603f
    KeyPressMask             KeyReleaseMask           ButtonPressMask          
    ButtonReleaseMask        EnterWindowMask          LeaveWindowMask          
    ButtonMotionMask         KeymapStateMask          StructureNotifyMask      
    SubstructureNotifyMask   SubstructureRedirectMask FocusChangeMask          
  number of visuals:    1
  default visual id:  0x20
    visual id:    0x20
    class:    TrueColor
    depth:    24 planes
    available colormap entries:    256 per subfield
    red, green, blue masks:    0xff0000, 0xff00, 0xff
    significant bits in color specification:    8 bits
Robert King, Australian Environmental Studies, Griffith University, Australia
3875 6677   Robert.King@mailbox.gu.edu.au   http://www.ens.gu.edu.au/robertk/

>   1. is qmail as secure as they say?

Depends on what they were saying, but most likely yes.
	-- Seen on debian-devel

Received: (at 67384-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Jul 2005 22:32:50 +0000
>From tbm@cyrius.com Sun Jul 31 15:32:50 2005
Return-path: <tbm@cyrius.com>
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
	id 1DzMMU-00084N-00; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 15:32:50 -0700
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
	id EE07564D54; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 22:32:49 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id D196484B0; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:32:33 +0100 (BST)
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:32:33 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
To: 67384-done@bugs.debian.org, 184828-done@bugs.debian.org,
	246343-done@bugs.debian.org, 257686-done@bugs.debian.org,
Subject: Removed from Debian - unmaintained
Message-ID: <20050731223233.GA30728@deprecation.cyrius.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: 67384-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 128

This package has now been removed from Debian because nobody was
interested in maintaining it; see
for more information.

Martin Michlmayr

Reply to: