On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 10:18:32PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > it was nice if you wouldn't blindly tag bugs sid without doing some > minimal checking. > If this bug exists in sid, it obviously also exists in sarge. > If not, please explain why you disagree. The "minimal checking" I did was to note that there was a build of this package available in testing for mips and mipsel, built by the autobuilders; normally, this means that Ryan has reviewed the build log for that package before signing, and confirmed that it is not affected by these porting bugs. However, on closer inspection I see that package has been there since 2002, and the diff between the two versions shows no changes to libtool -- or anything else, except for config.guess and config.sub. So you're right, this bug does apply to the version in sarge, which appears to only be there because it was uploaded before the mips porters became aware of this problem. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature