Bug#225383: marked as done (noteedit: Fails to start (x86))
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:29:38 +0000
with message-id <20050323202937.GA10249@localhost>
and subject line Bug#225383: noteedit: Fails to start (x86)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Dec 2003 12:57:39 +0000
>From tal00r@ecs.soton.ac.uk Mon Dec 29 06:57:38 2003
Return-path: <tal00r@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Received: from raven.ecs.soton.ac.uk [152.78.70.1]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AawVR-00059s-00; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 06:28:21 -0600
Received: from roadrunner.ecs.soton.ac.uk (roadrunner.ecs.soton.ac.uk [152.78.68.161])
by raven.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA06627
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 12:28:19 GMT
Received: from pandora.ecs.soton.ac.uk (pandora.ecs.soton.ac.uk [152.78.68.157])
by roadrunner.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id hBTCSEl3023946;
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 12:28:14 GMT
Received: from everest.ecs.soton.ac.uk (everest [152.78.70.56])
by pandora.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hBTCSEF00848;
Mon, 29 Dec 2003 12:28:14 GMT
Received: from tal00r by everest.ecs.soton.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1AawSV-0003GZ-00; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 12:25:19 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Thomas Leonard <tal00r@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: noteedit: Fails to start (x86)
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 12:25:19 +0000
Message-Id: <E1AawSV-0003GZ-00@everest.ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-ECS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_28
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_28
X-Spam-Level:
Package: noteedit
Version: 2.3.2-1
Severity: normal
When run, noteedit prints some debugging info and then quits without
ever opening a window:
$ noteedit
Xlib: extension "GLX" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib: extension "GLX" missing on display ":0.0".
LilyPond check: detection not possible
TSE3 ALSA MIDI scheduler created
$
With gdb:
$ gdb noteedit
(gdb) r
[...]
LilyPond check: Detaching after fork from child process 1065.
detection not possible
TSE3 ALSA MIDI scheduler created
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 1102721952 (LWP 1050)]
0x4018eb1b in NMidiMapper::NMidiMapper() () from
/usr/lib/libnoteedit.so.1
(gdb) bt
#0 0x4018eb1b in NMidiMapper::NMidiMapper() () from
/usr/lib/libnoteedit.so.1
#1 0x08049c51 in ?? ()
#2 0x080c98a8 in ?? ()
#3 0x0804a318 in _IO_stdin_used ()
#4 0x00000001 in ?? ()
Oddly, running a second copy of 'noteedit' while the first is being
debugged in gdb works (the window opens and you can use it!).
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux everest 2.4.20 #6 Fri Apr 4 12:58:54 BST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 225383-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Mar 2005 20:29:53 +0000
>From piem@altern.org Wed Mar 23 12:29:53 2005
Return-path: <piem@altern.org>
Received: from 81-179-199-29.dsl.pipex.com (localhost.localdomain) [81.179.199.29]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DECUC-0002GH-00; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 12:29:52 -0800
Received: from piem by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DECTy-0002rO-E6
for 225383-done@bugs.debian.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:29:38 +0000
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2005 20:29:38 +0000
From: Paul Brossier <piem@altern.org>
To: 225383-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#225383: noteedit: Fails to start (x86)
Message-ID: <20050323202937.GA10249@localhost>
Reply-To: Paul Brossier <piem@altern.org>
References: <20050322005210.GA27506@localhost> <20050323200529.GA4124@nono>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20050323200529.GA4124@nono>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: 225383-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
On Wed, Mar 23, 2005 at 08:05:30PM +0000, Thomas Leonard wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 22, 2005 at 12:52:10AM +0000, Paul Brossier wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am looking at the bug report you submitted a while ago about
> > noteedit (http://bugs.debian.org/225383). If i understand
> > correctly, the problem occurs noteedit is started withouth ALSA
> > sequencer support loaded in the kernel (snd-seq).
>
> I think it's just if you didn't start it from within KDE. However, I've
> just tested the latest version in Debian/unstable, and it started up
> fine now.
all right. most likely the bug has been closed with a previous
upload in between. closing the bug now,
thanks, piem
Reply to: