[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#285069: marked as done (aegis3: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of 'gettime_lex' follows non-static declaration)



Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:50:36 +0000
with message-id <20050316125036.GA17858@deprecation.cyrius.com>
and subject line removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Dec 2004 13:16:58 +0000
>From aj@andaco.de Fri Dec 10 05:16:58 2004
Return-path: <aj@andaco.de>
Received: from c158155.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain) [213.39.158.155] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Cckdm-0001cr-00; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 05:16:58 -0800
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1Cckht-0004RT-Qy; Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:21:13 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
From: Andreas Jochens <aj@andaco.de>
Subject: aegis3: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of 'gettime_lex' follows non-static declaration
Message-Id: <E1Cckht-0004RT-Qy@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Fri, 10 Dec 2004 14:21:13 +0100
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: aegis3
Severity: normal
Tags: patch

When building 'aegis3' on amd64 with gcc-4.0,
I get the following error:

gcc -g -O2 -Icommon -Ilibaegis -Icommon -c common/gettime.gen.c
common/gettime.y:1266: error: static declaration of 'gettime_lex' follows non-static declaration
y.tab.c:1667: error: previous implicit declaration of 'gettime_lex' was here
make[1]: *** [common/gettime.gen.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/aegis3-3.29'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

With the attached patch 'aegis3' can be compiled
on amd64 using gcc-4.0.

Regards
Andreas Jochens

diff -urN ../tmp-orig/aegis3-3.29/common/gettime.y ./common/gettime.y
--- ../tmp-orig/aegis3-3.29/common/gettime.y	2001-10-31 21:41:51.000000000 +0100
+++ ./common/gettime.y	2004-12-10 13:50:51.432966320 +0100
@@ -1263,9 +1263,9 @@
  *	int; the yacc token, 0 means the-end.
  */
 
-static int yylex _((void));
+int yylex _((void));
 
-static int
+int
 yylex()
 {
 	int	sign;

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 285069-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Mar 2005 12:50:52 +0000
>From tbm@cyrius.com Wed Mar 16 04:50:51 2005
Return-path: <tbm@cyrius.com>
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DBXz9-00013S-00; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 04:50:51 -0800
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
	id BFD7864D40; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:50:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 4BC244EDA4; Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:50:36 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:50:36 +0000
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
To: 285069-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: removed
Message-ID: <20050316125036.GA17858@deprecation.cyrius.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Delivered-To: 285069-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Removed from the archive.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/



Reply to: