Bug#213968: marked as done (zope-sqlrelayda: zope 2.6.2 now depends on python2.2)
Your message dated Thu, 26 Feb 2004 06:33:23 +0100
with message-id <16445.34083.805694.985720@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
and subject line closing sqlrelay reports, fixed in current version
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Oct 2003 16:12:43 +0000
>From luca@master.debian.org Fri Oct 03 11:12:40 2003
Return-path: <luca@master.debian.org>
Received: from luca by master.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A5SXl-000599-00; Fri, 03 Oct 2003 11:12:37 -0500
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 11:12:36 -0500
From: Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis <luca@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: zope-sqlrelayda: zope 2.6.2 now depends on python2.2
Message-ID: <20031003161235.GA18466@debian.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.3.28i (2002-03-13)
X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 6.1 (2002 Mar 24, compiled Apr 14 2002 20:39:56)
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux master i686
X-GPG-Fingerprint: 52B3 60E3 68DF B747 1A24 7ED2 85B9 9075 C291 0E41
X-ICQ-UIN: 66094859
Sender: Luca De Vitis <luca@master.debian.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_1 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: zope-sqlrelayda
Version: 1:0.33.1-0.2
Severity: grave
This package should depends on python2.2-sqlrelay instead of
python2.1-sqlrelay.
ciao,
--
Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis | Elegant or ugly code as well
aliases: Luca ^De [A-Z][A-Za-z\-]*[iy]'\?s$ | as fine or rude sentences have
Luca, a wannabe ``Good guy''. | something in common: they
local LANG="it_IT@euro" | don't depend on the language.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 213968-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Feb 2004 05:36:45 +0000
>From doko@cs.tu-berlin.de Wed Feb 25 21:36:45 2004
Return-path: <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AwECT-0003W1-00; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 21:36:45 -0800
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (doko@bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA27483;
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 06:33:24 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from doko@localhost)
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id i1Q5XNpB008743;
Thu, 26 Feb 2004 06:33:23 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <16445.34083.805694.985720@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 06:33:23 +0100
To: 168322-done@bugs.debian.org, 169773-done@bugs.debian.org,
189840-done@bugs.debian.org, 194840-done@bugs.debian.org,
205244-done@bugs.debian.org, 213968-done@bugs.debian.org,
194866-done@bugs.debian.org, 175819-done@bugs.debian.org,
202732-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: closing sqlrelay reports, fixed in current version
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under 21.4 (patch 6) "Common Lisp" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: 213968-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_22
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_22
X-Spam-Level:
closing sqlrelay reports, tagged as fixed (and are fixed in current version).
Reply to: