Bug#244276: What do you guys think about #244276?
Eitan Gurari writes:
> > > [...] In other word, does the DFSG allows such thing?
> > I think so in letter, especially given the LPPL's definitions, but it
> > feels bad to obstruct people wanting to adapt the software to their
> > needs. It would be good if Eitan could mark distributable comments and
> > supply those in the source. I quite understand if he wants to keep
> > some messages from others to him out of the Work.
> OK. I'll clean my literate files sometimes in autumn and add them to
> the tex4ht distribution. I just hope my work will not be in vain and
> some people will end up using the literate files.
> > tex4ht's copyright file appears to include an old version of the LPPL
> > and should be updated IMO.
> I'll fix the copyright notice to fit
> > Hope that helps,
> Definitely. Thanks to all who participated in this thread of emails.
Done. The literate sources can be found at