Bug#240992: This is a feature request rather than a bug...
severity 240992 normal
Jeroen van Wolffelaar <email@example.com> writes:
> I might be mistaken, but isn't it so that currently, if you accidently
> have libktoblzcheck1-dev installed, the resulted binary is linked
> against it, and otherwise, it isn't?
> Then, isn't it true that this package either
> 1) needs to build-depends on libktoblzcheck1-dev
> 2) needs to build-conflicts on libktoblzcheck1-dev
> 3) needs to be ./configured to not link to libktoblzcheck1-dev, whether
> it's available or not?
Yes, I believe you are correct. Number (2) is a foolish idea; the
package should either use the library, and adopt (1), or it should
not, and use (3).
That means that a maybe-yes-maybe-no is inconsistent and a bug in the
package. So since I'm the new maintainer, I'm bumping it back up to