Broken Package gdesklets
Hello,
excuse me, for my bad english. :-)
I have problems with gdesklets.
I have install gdesklets with apt-get install gdesklets and
gdesklets-data, then i want start gdesklets over Gnome-menu, but don't
happens.
My System
i386
sarge
Version:
debian:/home/dme# dpkg -l gdesklets
Gewünscht=Unbekannt/Installieren/R=Entfernen/P=Säubern/Halten
| Status=Nicht/Installiert/Config/U=Entpackt/Fehlgeschl. Konf./Halb
install.
|/ Fehler?=(keiner)/Halten/R=Neuinst. notw/X=beides (Status, Fehler:
GROß=schlec ht)
||/ Name Version Beschreibung
+++-==============-==============-============================================
ii gdesklets 0.26.2-5 an advanced architecture for desktop
applets
...
debian:/home/dme# dpkg -s gdesklets
Package: gdesklets
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: gnome
Installed-Size: 1096
Maintainer: Sebastien Bacher <seb128@debian.org>
Architecture: i386
Version: 0.26.2-5
Replaces: gdesklets-data (<< 0.21)
Depends: libart-2.0-2 (>= 2.3.16), libatk1.0-0 (>= 1.6.0), libbonobo2-0
(>= 2.6. 0), libbonoboui2-0 (>= 2.5.4), libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4),
libgconf2-4 (>= 2.6.1), l ibgcrypt7, libglib2.0-0 (>= 2.4.1),
libgnome2-0 (>= 2.6.0), libgnomecanvas2-0 (> = 2.6.0), libgnomeui-0 (>=
2.6.0), libgnomevfs2-0 (>= 2.6.0), libgnutls10 (>= 1. 0.0-0),
libgpg-error0 (>= 0.7), libgtk2.0-0 (>= 2.4.1), libgtop2-2, libice6 | xl
ibs (>> 4.1.0), liborbit2 (>= 1:2.10.0), libpango1.0-0 (>= 1.4.0),
libpopt0 (>= 1.7), libsm6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libtasn1-2 (>= 0.2.7),
libxml2 (>= 2.6.10), zli b1g (>= 1:1.2.1), gconf2 (>= 2.4.0),
python-gnome2 (>= 2.0), python-gtk2 (>= 2.0 ), python-numeric (>=
23.0-7)
Recommends: gdesklets-data
Conflicts: gdesklets-data (<< 0.21)
Conffiles:
/etc/gconf/schemas/gdesklets-display-thumbnail.schemas
bde490ca955ccb6c41fe2387 35045316
Description: an advanced architecture for desktop applets
gDesklets provides an advanced architecture for desktop applets
tiny displays sitting on your desktop in a symbiotic relationship
of eye candy and usefulness.
best regards
Dirk Meyer
Reply to: