[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#114501: marked as done (Package is uninstallable: depends on non-existent package sphinx2-hmm-6k)



Your message dated 10 Aug 2004 01:20:23 -0700
with message-id <87vffrh0ag.fsf@becket.becket.net>
and subject line bug done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Oct 2001 23:06:39 +0000
>From aquarius@kryogenix.org Thu Oct 04 18:06:39 2001
Return-path: <aquarius@kryogenix.org>
Received: from pcow029o.blueyonder.co.uk (blueyonder.co.uk) [195.188.53.123] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 15pHZe-0005so-00; Thu, 04 Oct 2001 18:06:39 -0500
Received: from giles ([62.31.193.114]) by blueyonder.co.uk  with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.687.68);
	 Fri, 5 Oct 2001 00:06:58 +0100
Received: from aquarius by giles with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian))
	id 15pHcJ-000202-00; Fri, 05 Oct 2001 00:09:23 +0100
From: Aquarius <aquarius@kryogenix.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Package is uninstallable: depends on non-existent package sphinx2-hmm-6k
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.28
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.28
Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2001 00:09:23 +0100
Message-Id: <E15pHcJ-000202-00@giles>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: sphinx2-bin
Version: N/A; reported 2001-10-05
Severity: normal

The sphinx2-bin package depends on sphinx2-hmm-6k, which is not
installable and does not appear to even exist, looking at
packages.debian.org.

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux giles 2.2.19 #1 Wed Jun 6 00:09:58 BST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 114501-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2004 08:20:24 +0000
>From tb@becket.net Tue Aug 10 01:20:24 2004
Return-path: <tb@becket.net>
Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BuRrs-0004x4-00; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 01:20:24 -0700
Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1BuRrr-0005gX-U6
	for 114501-done@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 01:20:23 -0700
To: 114501-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: bug done
X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute
		 permission for an emailed response.
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51  63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E  EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92
X-Tom-Swiftie: "Be sure to add that host to the DNS," Tom said authoritatively
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
Date: 10 Aug 2004 01:20:23 -0700
Message-ID: <87vffrh0ag.fsf@becket.becket.net>
Lines: 4
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: 114501-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2


This bug was fixed in NMU 0.4-0.1, and accepted when QA took the
package at version 0.4-1.



Reply to: