[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#159193: marked as done (Please remove dependency to libstorable-perl)

Your message dated 10 Aug 2004 01:02:12 -0700
with message-id <87y8knifp7.fsf@becket.becket.net>
and subject line bug done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Sep 2002 18:46:30 +0000
>From ch@lathspell.de Sun Sep 01 13:46:30 2002
Return-path: <ch@lathspell.de>
Received: from ktanco.hitnet.rwth-aachen.de (app109.hitnet.rwth-aachen.de) [] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 17lZjy-0004oR-00; Sun, 01 Sep 2002 13:46:30 -0500
Received: by app109.hitnet.rwth-aachen.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 9795B8164; Sun,  1 Sep 2002 20:46:29 +0200 (CEST)
From: Christian Hammers <ch@debian.org>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Please remove dependency to libstorable-perl
Message-Id: <20020901184629.9795B8164@app109.hitnet.rwth-aachen.de>
Date: Sun,  1 Sep 2002 20:46:29 +0200 (CEST)
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: gutenbook
Severity: important

This module is now included in perl-5.8.



Received: (at 159193-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2004 08:02:13 +0000
>From tb@becket.net Tue Aug 10 01:02:13 2004
Return-path: <tb@becket.net>
Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BuRaH-00033G-00; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 01:02:13 -0700
Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1BuRaG-0005Yk-Sr
	for 159193-done@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 01:02:12 -0700
To: 159193-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: bug done
X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute
		 permission for an emailed response.
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51  63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E  EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92
X-Tom-Swiftie: "What's the command syntax in `ed'?" Tom questioned
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
Date: 10 Aug 2004 01:02:12 -0700
Message-ID: <87y8knifp7.fsf@becket.becket.net>
Lines: 4
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: 159193-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 

This bug was fixed by the maintainer, but it got taken as an NMU for
some reason and not actually closed.

Reply to: