[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#171381: marked as done (xstroke_0.5.12-ma5-2.1(unstable/ia64): FTBFS: needs flex)



Your message dated 10 Aug 2004 00:32:47 -0700
with message-id <873c2vmork.fsf@becket.becket.net>
and subject line bugs done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Dec 2002 00:26:17 +0000
>From bdale@gag.com Sun Dec 01 18:26:17 2002
Return-path: <bdale@gag.com>
Received: from winfree.gag.com [192.133.104.8] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18IePg-0002XZ-00; Sun, 01 Dec 2002 18:26:16 -0600
Received: from spampd.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by winfree.gag.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C77C34A
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun,  1 Dec 2002 17:26:16 -0700 (MST)
Received: from rover.gag.com (rover.gag.com [192.133.104.32])
	by winfree.gag.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A8EC34A
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sun,  1 Dec 2002 17:26:15 -0700 (MST)
Received: by rover.gag.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id EF80B43C74; Sun,  1 Dec 2002 19:26:14 -0500 (EST)
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: xstroke_0.5.12-ma5-2.1(unstable/ia64): FTBFS: needs flex
From: Bdale Garbee <bdale@gag.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2002 19:26:14 -0500
Message-ID: <87fzthi7vd.fsf@rover.gag.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
	tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: xstroke
Version: 0.5.12-ma5-2.1
Severity: important

This package fails on the ia64 autobuilder as shown below... looks like more
build dependencies needed?

Bdale

| Automatic build of xstroke_0.5.12-ma5-2.1 on caballero by sbuild/ia64 1.169
| Build started at 20021201-2058

[...]

| flex -t rec_lex.l > rec_lex.c
| /bin/sh: line 1: flex: command not found
| make[1]: *** [rec_lex.c] Error 127

[...]

A complete build log can be found at
http://buildd.debian.org/build.php?arch=ia64&pkg=xstroke&ver=0.5.12-ma5-2.1


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 171381-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2004 07:32:47 +0000
>From tb@becket.net Tue Aug 10 00:32:47 2004
Return-path: <tb@becket.net>
Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1BuR7n-0005ck-00; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:32:47 -0700
Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1BuR7n-0005Pu-E9; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:32:47 -0700
To: 166346-done@bugs.debian.org, 196334-done@bugs.debian.org,
        238625-done@bugs.debian.org, 171381-done@bugs.debian.org,
        170467-done@bugs.debian.org, 181141-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: bugs done
X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute
		 permission for an emailed response.
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51  63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E  EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92
X-Windows: Warn your friends about it.
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <tb@becket.net>
Date: 10 Aug 2004 00:32:47 -0700
Message-ID: <873c2vmork.fsf@becket.becket.net>
Lines: 5
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: 171381-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 3


These bugs were fixed by NMUs 0.5.12-ma5-2.1, 0.5.12-ma5-2.2,
and 0.5.12-ma5-2.3, and accepted when the package was taken by QA in
version 0.5.12-ma5-3.



Reply to: