Bug#159941: marked as done (nedit: segfaults)
Your message dated Fri, 19 Mar 2004 14:32:03 -0500
with message-id <E1B4Pit-00087P-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#162209: fixed in nedit 1:5.4-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Sep 2002 10:37:30 +0000
>From jens@irs-net.com Sat Sep 07 05:37:30 2002
Return-path: <jens@irs-net.com>
Received: from dialin-145-254-143-149.arcor-ip.net (cello) [145.254.143.149]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 17ncy1-0001OK-00; Sat, 07 Sep 2002 05:37:29 -0500
Received: by cello
via sendmail from stdin
id <m17ncsl-001rcgC@cello> (Debian Smail3.2.0.114)
Sat, 7 Sep 2002 12:32:03 +0200 (CEST)
Message-Id: <m17ncsl-001rcgC@cello>
Subject: nedit: segfaults
Bcc:
From: "Jens Luedicke" <jens@irs-net.com>
To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <submit@bugs.debian.org>
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.99.50
Date: Sat, 07 Sep 2002 12:32:03 +0200
X-BadReturnPath: jens@cello rewritten as jens@irs-net.com
using "From" header
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: nedit
Version: 1:5.2-1.1
Severity: normal
NEdit segfaults when I open a new window and select
Windows -> Split Windows
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux cello 2.4.19 #1 Sun Aug 11 19:57:26 CEST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages nedit depends on:
ii lesstif1 1:0.93.36-1 OSF/Motif implementation released
ii libc6 2.2.5-14 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii xlibs 4.1.0-17 X Window System client libraries
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 162209-close) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Mar 2004 19:38:08 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Fri Mar 19 11:38:07 2004
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B4Pol-0000NZ-00; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 11:38:07 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B4Pit-00087P-00; Fri, 19 Mar 2004 14:32:03 -0500
From: Alexandre Pineau <alexandre.pineau@free.fr>
To: 162209-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.45 $
Subject: Bug#162209: fixed in nedit 1:5.4-1
Message-Id: <E1B4Pit-00087P-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 14:32:03 -0500
Delivered-To: 162209-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
X-Spam-Level:
Source: nedit
Source-Version: 1:5.4-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
nedit, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
nedit_5.4-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/n/nedit/nedit_5.4-1.diff.gz
nedit_5.4-1.dsc
to pool/main/n/nedit/nedit_5.4-1.dsc
nedit_5.4-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/n/nedit/nedit_5.4-1_i386.deb
nedit_5.4.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/n/nedit/nedit_5.4.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 162209@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alexandre Pineau <alexandre.pineau@free.fr> (supplier of updated nedit package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 17:27:34 +0100
Source: nedit
Binary: nedit
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1:5.4-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alexandre Pineau <alexandre.pineau@free.fr>
Changed-By: Alexandre Pineau <alexandre.pineau@free.fr>
Description:
nedit - A powerful, customizable, Motif based text editor
Closes: 162209 174065 178686 184553 195321 213564 229919
Changes:
nedit (1:5.4-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New Maintainer: Alexandre Pineau (Closes: #229919)
* New co-maintainer: Thosten Haude
* New upstream release :
+ Replaces csh-specific scriptlet with awklet.
+ Workaround for KDE's FONTLIST bug (and for the various BACKGROUND and
FOREGROUND resource values).(Closes: #184553)
* sh is now the default shell for NEdit (Closes: #178686)
* Use lesstif2 (Motif 2.1 compatible) for building the package and update the
Build-depends (Closes: #162209, #174065)
* remove manual confirmation to continue the building of NEdit if a an
untested version of Lesstif is used.
* add HTML documentation to doc-base
* call the clean rule instead of cleaning the sources tree 'by hand'
* clean links from util and source directories
* link NEdit dynamically to lesstif (Closes: #195321)
* mfile menu.c, line 4343 : remove {} from badFilenameChars to correct the
neditdb corruption issue with Tom Lord's Arch revisions control system
(Closes: #213564)
* use quoted string in the file menu and the title of the menu entry is now
properly capitalized.
* Standards-Version bumped to 3.6.1.0 -- no changes.
Files:
fc9c8b0ce650e7801bc3efd07d9264b8 662 editors optional nedit_5.4-1.dsc
2fc6c8e776d5ef86f73b5b9884d81fed 1218620 editors optional nedit_5.4.orig.tar.gz
6408c87be9a80952db4f4038e1b66bbb 7349 editors optional nedit_5.4-1.diff.gz
0b2bbc645945f18e815f3df1b6de8971 646190 editors optional nedit_5.4-1_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAWq3rZvwdf4aUbWkRAhERAJ4ywL69N++x4Q5jWyiOLMfxPfp/OgCfZGAb
4g8t/FfQVSwYhtv8ldw7BZA=
=o6wR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: