Bug#183005: marked as done (Could use the irc alternative)
Your message dated Mon, 8 Mar 2004 21:37:15 +0100
with message-id <20040308203715.GF5647@djpig.de>
and subject line removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Mar 2003 17:42:06 +0000
>From ymir@wolfheart.ro Sat Mar 01 11:41:57 2003
Return-path: <ymir@wolfheart.ro>
Received: from (heimdall) [62.231.71.38] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18pAzl-0006oa-00; Sat, 01 Mar 2003 11:41:57 -0600
Received: from ymir by heimdall with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18pAzi-0005zj-00
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 01 Mar 2003 19:41:54 +0200
Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2003 19:41:54 +0200
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Could use the irc alternative
Message-ID: <20030301174154.GA23044@heimdall>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
From: Birzan George Cristian <ymir@wolfheart.ro>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.9 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: epic
Severity: minor
After asking on debian-devel and not receiving that much feedback, I
decided to go ahead and file a minor bug against all console IRC
clients, suggesting that they use the irc alternative. Reasoning: they
provide the same functionality, which, according to the Policy, means
the packages _can_ use that alternative.
The only exception is epic, which _should_ use that alternative, since
epic4 and ircII are using it, and they're all quite similar. I'll file
minor bug report against epic.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 183005-done) by bugs.debian.org; 8 Mar 2004 20:37:40 +0000
>From frank@lichtenheld.de Mon Mar 08 12:37:40 2004
Return-path: <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B0RVL-0003pU-00; Mon, 08 Mar 2004 12:37:40 -0800
Received: from pd953086c.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.83.8.108] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
id 1B0RVJ-0008Rx-00; Mon, 08 Mar 2004 21:37:39 +0100
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1B0RUz-0004GE-00; Mon, 08 Mar 2004 21:37:17 +0100
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 21:37:15 +0100
From: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
To: 79979-done@bugs.debian.org, 105286-done@bugs.debian.org,
116900-done@bugs.debian.org, 183005-done@bugs.debian.org,
34035-done@bugs.debian.org, 130892-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: removed
Message-ID: <20040308203715.GF5647@djpig.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Delivered-To: 183005-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_08
X-Spam-Level:
epic was removed from Debian unstable today. Closing its bugs.
[Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 14:12:02 -0500] [ftpmaster: James Troup]
Removed the following packages from unstable:
epic | 3.004-20 | source, alpha, arm, hppa, i386, ia64, m68k,
mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc
Closed bugs: 184670
------------------- Reason -------------------
RoQA: oprhaned, superseded by epic4.
----------------------------------------------
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
Reply to: