[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#124927: marked as done (libctk3: Spelling error in description)



Your message dated Sun, 15 Feb 2004 17:26:43 +0100
with message-id <20040215162643.GC706@djpig.de>
and subject line should'be been closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Dec 2001 22:38:37 +0000
>From mdz@csh.rit.edu Mon Dec 17 16:38:37 2001
Return-path: <mdz@csh.rit.edu>
Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.60] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16G6P7-0007Hs-00; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 16:38:37 -0600
Received: from 146-115-121-200.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([146.115.121.200] helo=mizar.alcor.net)
	by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #10)
	id 16G6P6-0001BD-00
	for maintonly@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 17:38:36 -0500
Received: from mdz by mizar.alcor.net with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 16G6P6-00018r-00
	for <maintonly@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 17:38:36 -0500
From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>
To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
Subject: libctk3: Spelling error in description
Message-Id: <E16G6P6-00018r-00@mizar.alcor.net>
Sender: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@alcor.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 17:38:36 -0500
Delivered-To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org

Package: libctk3
Severity: minor

This is an automated bug report.

I have recently conducted a mass spelling check of Debian package
descriptions.  In the process, some other errors were also detected,
such as capitalization, word wrap, and indentation problems.

Some notable guidelines that I used in the check include:

- Capitalization

  The names of languages (English, French, etc.) are capitalized in
  English.  Acronyms should be in all capital letters.

- Abbreviation

  In general, words should not be abbreviated as part of the
  description.  Exceptions include standard abbreviations like "etc.".
  This is especially important for proper keyword searches.

- Word joining

  For various reasons, technical terms tend to be artificially joined
  to form new words, like "bugreport".  While this may be acceptable
  in an informal context, such words should be written separately in
  package descriptions, for clarity and to aid in searching.

In some cases where there the spelling check uncovered other errors, I
have made other edits in the diff for purposes of grammar and clarity.

There appear to be one or more errors in the description for this
package.  A unified diff follows at the end of this message.  You
should be able to apply it to your source tree by piping this message
directly into a command line like:

        patch /home/me/somewhere/mypackage/debian/control

There is a chance that this may not work if your control has been
modified from the version of your source package in the Debian
archive.  If so, you will have to apply the diff by hand.  When doing
so, please take note if there are multiple corrections on the same
line of the diff.

If you believe this correction to be in error, please contact me
before closing this bug so that we can come to an understanding, and
so that provisions can be made for future spelling checks.

If you are not a native English speaker and would like assistance
improving your description, contact
debian-l10n-english@lists.debian.org.


--- orig/libctk3	Mon Dec 17 15:52:27 2001
+++ corrected/libctk3	Mon Dec 17 15:59:04 2001
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Package: libctk3
 Description: Console Tool Kit
- Console Tool Kit is a toolkit for writing textbased GUIs. The syntax is
+ Console Tool Kit is a toolkit for writing text-based GUIs. The syntax is
  almost the same as GTK+. It provides mouse support on the console through
  gpm.
  This package contains the runtime files needed by programs linked to ctk.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 124927-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2004 16:27:13 +0000
>From frank@lichtenheld.de Sun Feb 15 08:27:13 2004
Return-path: <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Received: from sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net) [217.160.169.191] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1AsP6v-00068A-00; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 08:27:13 -0800
Received: from p50839995.dip.t-dialin.net ([80.131.153.149] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
	by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp 
	(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.35 (Sorgfalt))
	id 1AsP6r-0006UA-00; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 17:27:11 +0100
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AsP6T-0003sX-00; Sun, 15 Feb 2004 17:26:45 +0100
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 17:26:43 +0100
From: Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
To: 124927-done@bugs.debian.org, 124928-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: should'be been closed
Message-ID: <20040215162643.GC706@djpig.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <frank@lichtenheld.de>
Delivered-To: 124927-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_12 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_12
X-Spam-Level: 

These bugs should've been closed, but the changelog entry was
malformated.

libctk (3.0.24.2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
    * Uploading with maintainer set to QA group
    * debian/control: corrected spelling mistakes in package descriptions
      (Closes: #124926 #124927 #124928)
    * debian/changelog: removed emacs tags
    * debian/copyright: de-dh_make-boilerplated

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org>
www: http://www.djpig.de/



Reply to: