On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 12:34:25AM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > * Debian Bug Tracking System <owner@bugs.debian.org> [2004-01-09 10:03]: > > - Patch to fix gnome dialog (Closes: #118472) > > Well, to be honest the manual page should also be changed -- the patch > that you have added to the bugreport only has it for the dialog. Haven't > taken a look at the .diff.gz yet, if you have only changed the dialog > message please consider doing it in the manpage too, as long as you > still have the source lying around anyway ;) I have just checked and the manpage is correct, it does mention sudo. I do remember reading your statement in the bug report and checking the manpage. Maybe you were making the fact based on an older version? My only change to the manpage has been: diff -Nru gnome-sudo-0.3/src/gnome-sudo.8 gnome-sudo-0.3.new/src/gnome-sudo.8 --- gnome-sudo-0.3/src/gnome-sudo.8 2001-11-01 18:59:11.000000000 +0100 +++ gnome-sudo-0.3.new/src/gnome-sudo.8 2004-01-03 23:29:28.000000000 +0100 @@ -67,6 +67,10 @@ .PP .Vb 1 \& % gnome-sudo -- gnome-opkg --pkgdbdir=/var/db/opkg +.SH BUGS +.B gnome-sudo +is currently not able to retrieve information from sudo as to if the +command executed succeded or not. .SH FILES .I /etc/sudoers .SH SEE ALSO And the manpage says "gnome-sudo \- GUI frontend to .BR sudo(8) (...)" > I don't reopen the bug yet for I am not sure if you have fixed that > part, too. > It was already fixed (at least since 0.3) Javi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature