[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#164936: marked as done (FTBFS: Build failure of kvdr on i386)



Your message dated Sat, 26 Apr 2003 19:18:34 -0400
with message-id <E199YwE-00046m-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#164936: fixed in kvdr 0.52-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Oct 2002 03:22:40 +0000
>From dancer@netfort.gr.jp Tue Oct 15 22:22:39 2002
Return-path: <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
Received: from mikilab.doshisha.ac.jp [202.23.156.50] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 181elb-0006uA-00; Tue, 15 Oct 2002 22:22:39 -0500
Received: from atoron.work.isl.doshisha.ac.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mikilab.doshisha.ac.jp (8.9.3/3.7W) with SMTP id MAA03587
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 16 Oct 2002 12:22:08 +0900
X-Authentication-Warning: mikilab.doshisha.ac.jp: Host localhost [127.0.0.1] claimed to be atoron.work.isl.doshisha.ac.jp
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2002 12:22:35 +0900
From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
To: submit bug tracking system <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: FTBFS: Build failure of kvdr on i386
Message-Id: <20021016122235.56c0cba5.dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
Organization: Netfort project
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.3 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-debian-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=5.0
	tests=NOSPAM_INC,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,
	      X_AUTH_WARNING
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 


Package: kvdr
Version: 0.51.1-1


kvdr fails to build from source on i386, when doing a binary-all build.

I am filing this bug to notify you that I failed to build your
package from source in the current sid distribution.
It is a serious problem that your source does not 
build from source using the information provided in your control files,
and such a package should not be distributed in a stable Debian distribution.

This build was done using pbuilder package.


Build log follows:
===========================================
checking for killpg in -lucb... no
checking for int... yes
checking size of int... 4
checking for long... yes
checking size of long... 4
checking for char *... yes
checking size of char *... 4
checking for char... yes
checking size of char... 1
checking for dlopen in -ldl... yes
checking for shl_unload in -ldld... no
checking for X... configure: error: Can't find X includes. Please check your installation and add the correct paths!
make: *** [configure-stamp] Error 1
===========================================


regards,
   junichi

-- 
dancer@debian.org  http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer




---------------------------------------
Received: (at 164936-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Apr 2003 23:24:45 +0000
>From katie@auric.debian.org Sat Apr 26 18:24:44 2003
Return-path: <katie@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 199Z2C-0002we-00; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 18:24:44 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 199YwE-00046m-00; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 19:18:34 -0400
From: Alastair McKinstry <mckinstry@computer.org>
To: 164936-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.33 $
Subject: Bug#164936: fixed in kvdr 0.52-1
Message-Id: <E199YwE-00046m-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@auric.debian.org>
Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 19:18:34 -0400
Delivered-To: 164936-close@bugs.debian.org

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
kvdr, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

kvdr_0.52-1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/k/kvdr/kvdr_0.52-1.diff.gz
kvdr_0.52-1.dsc
  to pool/main/k/kvdr/kvdr_0.52-1.dsc
kvdr_0.52-1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/k/kvdr/kvdr_0.52-1_i386.deb
kvdr_0.52.orig.tar.gz
  to pool/main/k/kvdr/kvdr_0.52.orig.tar.gz



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 164936@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Alastair McKinstry <mckinstry@computer.org> (supplier of updated kvdr package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 20:48:18 +0100
Source: kvdr
Binary: kvdr
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.52-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Alastair McKinstry <mckinstry@computer.org>
Changed-By: Alastair McKinstry <mckinstry@computer.org>
Description: 
 kvdr       - DVB (digital TV) Video Disk Recorder for KDE
Closes: 164936 185986
Changes: 
 kvdr (0.52-1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * New Maintainer.
   * New Upstream release.
   * Built against KDE3/Qt3. Closes: #185986, #164936.
   * Moved to Standards-Version: 3.5.9
Files: 
 bb1bf8d33684e23a6eea1ef45f3232ca 595 misc extra kvdr_0.52-1.dsc
 72c166af765cf515760304f00dbb76fc 408770 misc extra kvdr_0.52.orig.tar.gz
 d2a91d4883ccc31c3757a12430feb511 13036 misc extra kvdr_0.52-1.diff.gz
 22298fcc2cff2403bc9173c09b94f9ec 93612 misc extra kvdr_0.52-1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+qxH8+o43kJBROPQRAmkEAJ0SQazon78QeRaPx6OErS29fA8N+ACg6rJM
mCLjW1myLaNwMHlUbgFxEZk=
=UvtV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: