Bug#132099: marked as done (wanpipe: Files in etc not marked as conffiles)
Your message dated Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:15:24 +1000
with message-id <20030923041524.GA811@deprecation.cyrius.com>
and subject line wanpipe has been removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Feb 2002 18:34:11 +0000
>From malcolm@ivywell.screaming.net Sun Feb 03 12:34:11 2002
Return-path: <malcolm@ivywell.screaming.net>
Received: from pcow035o.blueyonder.co.uk (blueyonder.co.uk) [195.188.53.121]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16XRSt-0006N4-00; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 12:34:11 -0600
Received: from pcow035o.blueyonder.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.757.75);
Sun, 3 Feb 2002 18:34:10 +0000
Received: from localhost (unverified [62.30.104.135]) by pcow035o.blueyonder.co.uk
(Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.9) with ESMTP id <T58d9af0f6aac1785ed1e6@pcow035o.blueyonder.co.uk> for <maintonly@bugs.debian.org>;
Sun, 3 Feb 2002 18:34:10 +0000
Received: from malcolm by localhost with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
id 16XR1n-0003Tv-00
for <maintonly@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 18:06:11 +0000
From: Malcolm Parsons <malcolm@ivywell.screaming.net>
To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
Subject: wanpipe: Files in etc not marked as conffiles
Message-Id: <E16XR1n-0003Tv-00@localhost>
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2002 18:06:11 +0000
Delivered-To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
Package: wanpipe
Version: 2.1.1-2
Severity: Serious
Justification: Policy 11.7
wanpipe contains files in /etc that are not marked as conffiles.
This violates a must in Debian Policy, so is a Serious bug.
This is a mass bug submission, and has been discussed on debian-devel
starting at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2002/debian-devel-200201/msg02546.html
For details of which files in wanpipe are not marked as conffiles see
http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tfile-in-etc-not-marked-as-conffile.html
If your maintainer scripts modify these files, they must not be shipped
in the package.
If your maintainer scripts do not modify these files then they must be marked
as conffiles.
Example configuration files should be placed in
/usr/share/doc/wanpipe/examples
See Debian Policy 11.7 for more information.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 132099-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Sep 2003 04:16:09 +0000
>From tbm@cyrius.com Mon Sep 22 23:16:07 2003
Return-path: <tbm@cyrius.com>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A1eao-0007ht-00; Mon, 22 Sep 2003 23:16:03 -0500
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 3006426B95; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 06:16:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id EF00CFECC; Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:15:24 +1000 (EST)
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:15:24 +1000
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
To: 132099-done@bugs.debian.org, 190287-done@bugs.debian.org,
190288-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: wanpipe has been removed
Message-ID: <20030923041524.GA811@deprecation.cyrius.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: 132099-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.3 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_60,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,
SIGNATURE_SHORT_SPARSE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Closing wanpipe's other bugs since the package has been removed from
Debian unstable.
----- Forwarded message from Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> -----
From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
Subject: Re: why RC?
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 01:37:27 +0100
To: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
Cc: 190619-done@bugs.debian.org, tmancill@debian.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0
tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,USER_AGENT_MUTT
autolearn=ham version=2.55
On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 03:55:07PM +1000, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> Please remove wanpipe; it has been orphaned for a long time, doesn't
> have build-deps and is generally out of date; in #190619 the original
> maintainer said he'd request the removal but never got around to it.
This has been done now, so I'm closing this bug as no longer applicable:
=========================================================================
[Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:58:16 -0400] [ftpmaster: James Troup]
Removed the following packages from unstable:
wanpipe | 2.1.1-2.2 | source, i386
Closed bugs: 179392
------------------- Reason -------------------
ROM; orphaned, out-of-date, FTBFS.
----------------------------------------------
=========================================================================
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Martin Michlmayr
tbm@cyrius.com
Reply to: