[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#196073: marked as done (gtk-doc-tools: Missing dependency: gnome-common)



Your message dated Fri, 11 Jul 2003 10:17:42 -0400
with message-id <E19ayiU-0006xJ-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#196073: fixed in gtk-doc 1.0-10.1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 Jun 2003 11:57:41 +0000
>From martin.quinson@tuxfamily.org Wed Jun 04 06:57:40 2003
Return-path: <martin.quinson@tuxfamily.org>
Received: from wifi247.wlan.ens-lyon.fr (localhost) [140.77.32.247] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 19NWtg-0008Jw-00; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 06:57:40 -0500
Received: from mquinson by localhost with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 19NWti-00066W-00; Wed, 04 Jun 2003 13:57:42 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Martin Quinson <Martin.Quinson@tuxfamily.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: gtk-doc-tools: Missing dependency: gnome-common
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1
Date: Wed, 04 Jun 2003 13:57:42 +0200
Message-Id: <E19NWti-00066W-00@localhost>
Sender: Martin Quinson <martin.quinson@tuxfamily.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
	tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
	version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_24 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: gtk-doc-tools
Version: 1.0-4
Severity: normal

Hello,

As far as I can say, it is impossible to launch automake on packages
using gtk-doc-tools, because such packages have GNOME_GTKDOC_CHECK in
their configure.{ac,in}, which will fail unless the standard gnome
macros are installed in /usr/share/aclocal/gnome2-macros. Those files
come from the gnome-common package. 

A 'suggest' may be enough since the dbuilder normally don't need this,
but I still prefer a real dependency, since the gnome-common package is
so small, and since it is far less misleading.

Thanks for your time, Mt

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux galadriel 2.4.20 #1 dim mar 30 23:53:59 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=fr_FR@euro, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR@euro

Versions of packages gtk-doc-tools depends on:
ii  docbook-dsssl                 1.78-3     modular DocBook DSSSL stylesheets,
ii  docbook-to-man                1:2.0.0-11 Converter from DocBook SGML into r
ii  jade                          1.2.1-32   James Clark's DSSSL Engine
ii  perl                          5.8.0-17   Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  xsltproc                      1.0.30-1   XSLT command line processor

-- no debconf information


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 196073-close) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jul 2003 14:23:20 +0000
>From katie@auric.debian.org Fri Jul 11 09:23:20 2003
Return-path: <katie@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 19aynw-0007jd-00; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 09:23:20 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 19ayiU-0006xJ-00; Fri, 11 Jul 2003 10:17:42 -0400
From: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>
To: 196073-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.34 $
Subject: Bug#196073: fixed in gtk-doc 1.0-10.1
Message-Id: <E19ayiU-0006xJ-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@auric.debian.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 10:17:42 -0400
Delivered-To: 196073-close@bugs.debian.org

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gtk-doc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gtk-doc-tools_1.0-10.1_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gtk-doc/gtk-doc-tools_1.0-10.1_i386.deb
gtk-doc_1.0-10.1.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gtk-doc/gtk-doc_1.0-10.1.diff.gz
gtk-doc_1.0-10.1.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gtk-doc/gtk-doc_1.0-10.1.dsc



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 196073@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org> (supplier of updated gtk-doc package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 15:42:17 +0200
Source: gtk-doc
Binary: gtk-doc-tools
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0-10.1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>
Description: 
 gtk-doc-tools - GTK documentation tools
Closes: 196073
Changes: 
 gtk-doc (1.0-10.1) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * NMU
   * Yeah, I know, the package is orphaned..:-). I prefer mark this as NMU
     anyway (Christian as uploader). Thus, the bug will only be marked fixed.
     This leaves the next maintainer the possibility of reviewing it.
   * Now depends on gnome-common. Closes: #196073
Files: 
 2fac6cf9034dd8b2c171897c761080b9 662 gnome optional gtk-doc_1.0-10.1.dsc
 f11666f8a4b6003d460f1079c898c62e 8328 gnome optional gtk-doc_1.0-10.1.diff.gz
 d7ff3bd6074eac7b91bdb3d87fa1213e 86032 gnome optional gtk-doc-tools_1.0-10.1_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/DsWpiONoszDJNIoRAoHVAJ9k525nWPgn/b1I/0XA6dAhDfRxSgCfdqaU
b1tFztJ8gxizV7tffuSt7IQ=
=2D93
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: