[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#165178: FTBFS: Build failure of ts on i386



Package: ts
Version: 0011-1
Severity: serious


ts fails to build from source on i386, when doing a rebuild inside chroot.

I am filing this bug to notify you that I failed to build your
package from source in the current sid distribution.
It is a serious problem that your source does not 
build from source using the information provided in your control files,
and such a package should not be distributed in a stable Debian distribution.

This build was done using pbuilder package.


Build log follows:
===========================================
Document Class: article 2001/04/21 v1.4e Standard LaTeX document class
(/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/size12.clo))
(/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/fontenc.sty
(/usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/base/t1enc.def)kpathsea: Running mktextfm  ecrm1200
mktextfm: Running mf \mode:=ljfour; mag:=1; nonstopmode; input ecrm1200
This is METAFONT, Version 2.7182 (Web2C 7.3.7)
kpathsea: Running mktexmf  ecrm1200

! I can't find file `ecrm1200'.
<*> ...ljfour; mag:=1; nonstopmode; input ecrm1200
                                                  
Please type another input file name
! Emergency stop.
<*> ...ljfour; mag:=1; nonstopmode; input ecrm1200
                                                  
Transcript written on mfput.log.
mktextfm: `mf \mode:=ljfour; mag:=1; nonstopmode; input ecrm1200' failed.
kpathsea: Appending font creation commands to missfont.log.

<to be read again> 
                   relax 
l.95 \fontencoding\encodingdefault\selectfont
                                             
? 
! Emergency stop.
<to be read again> 
                   relax 
l.95 \fontencoding\encodingdefault\selectfont
                                             
No pages of output.
Transcript written on tstext.log.
make: *** [docu/tstext.dvi] Error 1
===========================================


regards,
   junichi


-- 
dancer@debian.org  http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer






Reply to: