Bug#76051: marked as done (It is marked as broken: Couldn't find zbytecodehacks.VSExec)
Your message dated Fri, 15 Mar 2002 16:18:30 -0500
with message-id <E16lz5q-0008QC-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#76051: fixed in zope-pythonmethod 0.1.7-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Nov 2000 22:40:46 +0000
>From docwhat@lego.gerf.net Wed Nov 01 16:40:46 2000
Return-path: <docwhat@lego.gerf.net>
Received: from 64-39-0-241.dhcp.hq.rackspace.com (lego) [::ffff:64.39.0.241]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 13r6Yo-00086b-00; Wed, 01 Nov 2000 16:40:46 -0600
Received: from docwhat by lego with local (Exim 3.16 #1 (Debian))
id 13r6ZL-0006HX-00; Wed, 01 Nov 2000 16:41:19 -0600
From: The Doctor What <docwhat@lego.gerf.net>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: It is marked as broken: Couldn't find zbytecodehacks.VSExec
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.3
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.3
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2000 16:41:19 -0600
Message-Id: <E13r6ZL-0006HX-00@lego>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: zope-pythonmethod
Version: 0.1.7-2
Severity: grave
PythonMethod Import Traceback
Traceback (innermost last):
File "/usr/lib/zope/lib/python/OFS/Application.py", line 397, in
import_products
product=__import__(pname, global_dict, global_dict, silly)
File "/usr/lib/zope/lib/python/Products/PythonMethod/__init__.py", line 4, in ?
import PythonMethod
File "/usr/lib/zope/lib/python/Products/PythonMethod/PythonMethod.py", line 14, in ?
import Guarded
File "/usr/lib/zope/lib/python/Products/PythonMethod/Guarded.py", line 1, in ?
from zbytecodehacks.VSExec import SafeBlock, GuardedOps, UntupleFunction
ImportError: No module named zbytecodehacks.VSExec
This is despite the fact I have the zope-byetcodehacks package installed.
I tried removing both packages, and re-installing zbytecodehacks first, then
pythonmodules.
Ciao!
-- System Information
Debian Release: woody
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux lego 2.4.0-test9 #3 Thu Oct 5 13:09:20 CDT 2000 i686
Versions of packages zope-pythonmethod depends on:
ii zope 2.2.2-3 The Z Object Publishing Environmen
ii zope-bytecodehacks 0.1.7-2 Rewrite bytecode of functions to d
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 76051-close) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Mar 2002 21:31:44 +0000
>From katie@auric.debian.org Fri Mar 15 15:31:44 2002
Return-path: <katie@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16lzIe-0005PT-00; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 15:31:44 -0600
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16lz5q-0008QC-00; Fri, 15 Mar 2002 16:18:30 -0500
From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
To: 76051-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.9 $
Subject: Bug#76051: fixed in zope-pythonmethod 0.1.7-4
Message-Id: <E16lz5q-0008QC-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@auric.debian.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 16:18:30 -0500
Delivered-To: 76051-close@bugs.debian.org
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
zope-pythonmethod, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
zope-bytecodehacks_0.1.7-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/z/zope-pythonmethod/zope-bytecodehacks_0.1.7-4_i386.deb
zope-pythonmethod_0.1.7-4.diff.gz
to pool/main/z/zope-pythonmethod/zope-pythonmethod_0.1.7-4.diff.gz
zope-pythonmethod_0.1.7-4.dsc
to pool/main/z/zope-pythonmethod/zope-pythonmethod_0.1.7-4.dsc
zope-pythonmethod_0.1.7-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/z/zope-pythonmethod/zope-pythonmethod_0.1.7-4_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 76051@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> (supplier of updated zope-pythonmethod package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2002 19:29:15 +0000
Source: zope-pythonmethod
Binary: zope-pythonmethod zope-bytecodehacks
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.1.7-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
Description:
zope-bytecodehacks - Rewrite bytecode of functions to do unlikely things in Python
zope-pythonmethod - Allows ZopeMethods to be written in plain Python code
Closes: 76051 78965 118969
Changes:
zope-pythonmethod (0.1.7-4) unstable; urgency=low
.
* QA upload.
* Add versioned python dependencies, which appear to be why the zope
maintainer wanted to conflict with old versions of zope product packages
(closes: #118969).
* Import Products.zbytecodehacks.VSExec, not zbytecodehacks.VSExec
(closes: #76051, #78965).
Files:
5779ed4ff9031fd3945a7ae97a109f78 656 web extra zope-pythonmethod_0.1.7-4.dsc
b91d255360781210bcd66a5e046773a6 4041 web extra zope-pythonmethod_0.1.7-4.diff.gz
d0ee35c12f9aa3f6a55e90666e720729 11828 web extra zope-pythonmethod_0.1.7-4_i386.deb
945144dc26f8fd69e990fe17383c3409 100104 web extra zope-bytecodehacks_0.1.7-4_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> -- Debian developer
iD8DBQE8klB19t0zAhD6TNERAk4fAJ4vIS4zh4/u5OfTUM+uQNUQqeYyKQCbBmF/
iHSPzaHyr4M5FM7xko7piUY=
=jAeX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: