[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#154251: marked as done ([sparc] sshd2 uses 100% CPU when logging in from remote)



Your message dated Sun, 29 Dec 2002 11:55:54 +0100
with message-id <E18Sb6o-0003nH-00@kalypso>
and subject line Your ssh2 bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jul 2002 12:10:58 +0000
>From harnisch@fgb.mw.tum.de Thu Jul 25 07:10:58 2002
Return-path: <harnisch@fgb.mw.tum.de>
Received: from fgb1.fgb.mw.tu-muenchen.de [129.187.200.1] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 17XhSL-0000FT-00; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 07:10:57 -0500
Received: from fpc115.fgb.mw.tu-muenchen.de (mail@fpc115 [129.187.200.215])
	by fgb1.fgb.mw.tu-muenchen.de (8.11.5/8.11.5) with ESMTP id g6PCALr05091
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 14:10:22 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from localhost
	([127.0.0.1] helo=fgb.mw.tum.de ident=willi)
	by fpc115.fgb.mw.tu-muenchen.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17XhRl-0007mh-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 14:10:21 +0200
Sender: willi@fgb.mw.tum.de
Message-ID: <3D3FEAAD.1D3EA7B6@fgb.mw.tum.de>
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 14:10:21 +0200
From: Jan Harnisch <harnisch@fgb.mw.tum.de>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.18-686 i686)
X-Accept-Language: de, de-DE, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: [sparc] sshd2 uses 100% CPU when logging in from remote
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: ssh2
Version: 2.0.13

When logging in from a remote machine, everything goes fine until
hitting [Enter] after typing the password. Sshd then seems to go into an
infinite loop and eats all available CPU capacity. sshd has to be
stopped with kill -9; the normal kill has no effect.
The strange thing about this is that I am quite sure I once had a
working setup, but I don't remember having changed anything since then
(and everything I changed in the ssh-config was setting the port to 22,
as I also do on my i386 machines).
Sorry for this report being quite poor; please email me for more
information.

I am using Debian GNU/Linux 3.0, kernel 2.2.20-SMP
and libc6 2.2.5-6 (recently upgraded to 2.2.5-10, but with no effect).

Greetings/Best regards,

Jan Harnisch

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 154251-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Dec 2002 10:55:56 +0000
>From bas@caradhras.net Sun Dec 29 04:55:56 2002
Return-path: <bas@caradhras.net>
Received: from smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl [194.109.127.138] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 18Sb6p-0002Qd-00; Sun, 29 Dec 2002 04:55:55 -0600
Received: from kalypso (ramstraat29.xs4all.nl [80.126.10.231])
	by smtpzilla2.xs4all.nl (8.12.0/8.12.0) with ESMTP id gBTAtsZR082410
	for <154251-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 29 Dec 2002 11:55:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: from bas by kalypso with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 18Sb6o-0003nH-00
	for <154251-done@bugs.debian.org>; Sun, 29 Dec 2002 11:55:54 +0100
From: Bas Zoetekouw <bas@debian.org>
To: 154251-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Your ssh2 bug
Message-Id: <E18Sb6o-0003nH-00@kalypso>
Sender: Bas Zoetekouw <bas@caradhras.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 11:55:54 +0100
Delivered-To: 154251-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0
	tests=SPAM_PHRASE_02_03
	version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Hi!

Ssh2 was removed from the Debian archive this morning.  It's
replacement, openssh (ssh package), does not seem to be affected
by this bug; therefore, I'm closing it.

Kind regards,
Bas Zoetekouw.



Reply to: