Re: Bug#167886: marked as done (tux-aqfh-data: should replace older versions of tux-aqfh )

To: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Bug#167886: marked as done (tux-aqfh-data: should replace older versions of tux-aqfh )
From: Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2002 12:07:52 +0000
Message-id: <[🔎] 20021201120752.GB17933@riva.ucam.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] handler.167886.D167886.10387418252398.ackdone@bugs.debian.org>
References: <E18IS6E-0003NC-00@auric.debian.org> <udlela082hu.fsf@tux.internal.ucko.debian.net> <[🔎] handler.167886.D167886.10387418252398.ackdone@bugs.debian.org>

On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 05:33:18AM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
>  tux-aqfh (1.0.14-2) unstable; urgency=low
>  .
>    * QA upload.
>    * Make tux-aqfh-data replace tux-aqfh (<< 1.0.14-1) to avoid conflicts
>      on upgrade.  Closes: #167886.
>    * Remove undocumented(7) symlink for tux_aqfh(6).  Its lack has been
>      reported as #171283; add Lintian override.
>    * Conforms to Standards version 3.5.8.

Why the Lintian override? If there's no man page, the error should stay
there without being overridden so that it appears on summaries like
http://qa.debian.org/man-pages.html.

-- 
Colin Watson                                  [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bug#167886: marked as done (tux-aqfh-data: should replace older versions of tux-aqfh )
  - From: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>

References:
- Bug#167886: marked as done (tux-aqfh-data: should replace older versions of tux-aqfh )
  - From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)

Prev by Date: Bug#170161: marked as done (nase-a60: Build-Depends on xlib6g*)
Next by Date: Re: Bug#170161: marked as done (nase-a60: Build-Depends on xlib6g*)
Previous by thread: Bug#167886: marked as done (tux-aqfh-data: should replace older versions of tux-aqfh )
Next by thread: Re: Bug#167886: marked as done (tux-aqfh-data: should replace older versions of tux-aqfh )
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread