[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#156175: marked as done (epan uninstallable because of libpcap change)



Your message dated 26 Aug 2002 03:28:21 +0200
with message-id <871y8mh0i2.fsf@fuzz.uucp>
and subject line Bug#156175: fixed in epan 1.3.1-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2002 14:01:52 +0000
>From torsten@debian.org Sat Aug 10 09:01:52 2002
Return-path: <torsten@debian.org>
Received: from mailout03.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.81] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 17dWoR-0004T9-00; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 09:01:52 -0500
Received: from fwd03.sul.t-online.de 
	by mailout03.sul.t-online.com with smtp 
	id 17dWoQ-0006ME-06; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 16:01:50 +0200
Received: from stargate.galaxy (320026820486-0001@[217.82.118.115]) by fmrl03.sul.t-online.com
	with esmtp id 17dWpb-1aE29QC; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 16:03:03 +0200
Received: from pulsar.galaxy (pulsar.galaxy [192.168.2.3])
	by stargate.galaxy (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id PAA12882
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 15:40:11 +0200
Received: from torsten by pulsar.galaxy with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17dWgM-0000G0-00
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 10 Aug 2002 15:53:30 +0200
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: epan uninstallable because of libpcap change
Message-Id: <[🔎] E17dWgM-0000G0-00@pulsar.galaxy>
From: Torsten Landschoff <torsten@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 15:53:30 +0200
X-Sender: 320026820486-0001@t-dialin.net
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: epan
Severity: normal
Tags: pending

When updating libpcap I renamed libpcap0 to libpcap0.7 which removed
libpcap0 from unstable. The result is, that epan and a number of other
packages are no longer installable from unstable. Therefore I made
NMUs for all affected packages - they will be installed into the
archive in 3 days. I hope this delay is acceptable since I only did a
rebuild without any changes to the source. Only the changelog was
touched - diff follows:


Sorry for the inconvenience

	Torsten

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 156175-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Aug 2002 01:50:33 +0000
>From mvela@public.srce.hr Sun Aug 25 20:50:33 2002
Return-path: <mvela@public.srce.hr>
Received: from jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130] (root)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 17j91V-0006dk-00; Sun, 25 Aug 2002 20:50:33 -0500
Received: from fuzz.uucp (mail@a162.cmu.carnet.hr [193.198.129.42])
	by jagor.srce.hr (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g7Q1nfYx003173
	for <156175-done@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 03:49:41 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mvela by fuzz.uucp with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 17j8g1-00011b-00
	for <156175-done@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 26 Aug 2002 03:28:21 +0200
From: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>
To: 156175-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#156175: fixed in epan 1.3.1-6
References: <[🔎] E17dWgM-0000G0-00@pulsar.galaxy>
Date: 26 Aug 2002 03:28:21 +0200
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] E17dWgM-0000G0-00@pulsar.galaxy>
Message-ID: <871y8mh0i2.fsf@fuzz.uucp>
Lines: 8
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Matej Vela <mvela@public.srce.hr>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/)
Delivered-To: 156175-done@bugs.debian.org

The epan source contains precompiled binaries, so rebuilding it with
the new libpcap-dev installed (that's what you did in 1.3.1-5.1,
right?) didn't update the libpcap dependency.  Version 1.3.1-6 uses a
statically linked binary, so this should no longer be a problem.

Thanks,

Matej



Reply to: