[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#125091: marked as done (loadwatch: Spelling error in description)

Your message dated Fri, 03 May 2002 17:17:08 -0400
with message-id <E173kQO-0006f8-00@auric.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#125091: fixed in loadwatch 1.0-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Dec 2001 22:46:02 +0000
>From mdz@csh.rit.edu Mon Dec 17 16:46:02 2001
Return-path: <mdz@csh.rit.edu>
Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net [] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16G6WI-0000Pu-00; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 16:46:02 -0600
Received: from 146-115-121-200.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com ([] helo=mizar.alcor.net)
	by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #10)
	id 16G6WH-0002Ot-00
	for maintonly@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 17:46:01 -0500
Received: from mdz by mizar.alcor.net with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 16G6WH-0001Xs-00
	for <maintonly@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 17 Dec 2001 17:46:01 -0500
From: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@debian.org>
To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org
Subject: loadwatch: Spelling error in description
Message-Id: <E16G6WH-0001Xs-00@mizar.alcor.net>
Sender: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@alcor.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2001 17:46:01 -0500
Delivered-To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org

Package: loadwatch
Severity: minor

This is an automated bug report.

I have recently conducted a mass spelling check of Debian package
descriptions.  In the process, some other errors were also detected,
such as capitalization, word wrap, and indentation problems.

Some notable guidelines that I used in the check include:

- Capitalization

  The names of languages (English, French, etc.) are capitalized in
  English.  Acronyms should be in all capital letters.

- Abbreviation

  In general, words should not be abbreviated as part of the
  description.  Exceptions include standard abbreviations like "etc.".
  This is especially important for proper keyword searches.

- Word joining

  For various reasons, technical terms tend to be artificially joined
  to form new words, like "bugreport".  While this may be acceptable
  in an informal context, such words should be written separately in
  package descriptions, for clarity and to aid in searching.

In some cases where there the spelling check uncovered other errors, I
have made other edits in the diff for purposes of grammar and clarity.

There appear to be one or more errors in the description for this
package.  A unified diff follows at the end of this message.  You
should be able to apply it to your source tree by piping this message
directly into a command line like:

        patch /home/me/somewhere/mypackage/debian/control

There is a chance that this may not work if your control has been
modified from the version of your source package in the Debian
archive.  If so, you will have to apply the diff by hand.  When doing
so, please take note if there are multiple corrections on the same
line of the diff.

If you believe this correction to be in error, please contact me
before closing this bug so that we can come to an understanding, and
so that provisions can be made for future spelling checks.

If you are not a native English speaker and would like assistance
improving your description, contact

--- orig/loadwatch	Mon Dec 17 15:52:22 2001
+++ corrected/loadwatch	Mon Dec 17 15:59:04 2001
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
  loadwatch forks a child process and only allows it to run when the system
  load meets user defined parameters.  loadwatch allows you to specify that a
  program should run only if the load is below a set point, and will stop it
- when that point is reached.  When the load falls below a second setpoint,
+ when that point is reached.  When the load falls below a second set point,
  the program will be continued.  The period of sampling the system load can
  also be specified by the user.

Received: (at 125091-close) by bugs.debian.org; 3 May 2002 21:38:15 +0000
>From katie@auric.debian.org Fri May 03 16:38:15 2002
Return-path: <katie@auric.debian.org>
Received: from auric.debian.org [] (mail)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 173kkp-000778-00; Fri, 03 May 2002 16:38:15 -0500
Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 173kQO-0006f8-00; Fri, 03 May 2002 17:17:08 -0400
From: Nicolas Boullis <nboullis@debian.org>
To: 125091-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.15 $
Subject: Bug#125091: fixed in loadwatch 1.0-6
Message-Id: <E173kQO-0006f8-00@auric.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@auric.debian.org>
Date: Fri, 03 May 2002 17:17:08 -0400
Delivered-To: 125091-close@bugs.debian.org

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
loadwatch, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

  to pool/main/l/loadwatch/loadwatch_1.0-6.diff.gz
  to pool/main/l/loadwatch/loadwatch_1.0-6.dsc
  to pool/main/l/loadwatch/loadwatch_1.0-6_i386.deb

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 125091@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
Nicolas Boullis <nboullis@debian.org> (supplier of updated loadwatch package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)

Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri,  3 May 2002 22:57:10 +0200
Source: loadwatch
Binary: loadwatch
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0-6
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Nicolas Boullis <nboullis@debian.org>
Changed-By: Nicolas Boullis <nboullis@debian.org>
 loadwatch  - Run a program using only idle cycles
Closes: 88990 101096 125091 142414
 loadwatch (1.0-6) unstable; urgency=low
   * New maintainer. (Closes: #142414)
   * Fixed a spelling error in the description. (Closes: #125091)
   * Fixed a "bug" in the manpage. (Closes: #101096)
   * Children exit if exec fails. (Closes: #88990)
   * Search the command in $PATH.
   * Fixed a (probably harmless) buffer overflow with more that 100
 741d4a38a35f349bb79d5ab3516876d3 600 utils optional loadwatch_1.0-6.dsc
 f96c8f455ec412240347f8a3f2a80537 3553 utils optional loadwatch_1.0-6.diff.gz
 bbe74c57ca4f2dddb619b09ea0fb7eda 7384 utils optional loadwatch_1.0-6_i386.deb

Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org


To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to: