[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#109409: marked as done (quickppp: recommends pppd, which doesn't exist)



Your message dated 17 Apr 2002 22:34:59 +0200
with message-id <87bsci3vyk.fsf@public.srce.hr>
and subject line Fixed in quickppp 1.2.0-1.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Aug 2001 19:55:34 +0000
>From cjw44@flatline.org.uk Mon Aug 20 14:55:34 2001
Return-path: <cjw44@flatline.org.uk>
Received: from tungsten.btinternet.com [194.73.73.81] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 15Yv93-00025r-00; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 14:55:34 -0500
Received: from [217.35.24.151] (helo=arborlon.riva.ucam.org)
	by tungsten.btinternet.com with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #9)
	id 15Yv8y-0001pJ-00; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 20:55:29 +0100
Received: from cjwatson by arborlon.riva.ucam.org with local (Exim 3.32 #1 (Debian))
	id 15Yv8c-0004i9-00; Mon, 20 Aug 2001 20:55:06 +0100
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 20:55:05 +0100
From: Colin Watson <cjw44@flatline.org.uk>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: quickppp: recommends pppd, which doesn't exist
Message-ID: <20010820205505.A18103@arborlon.riva.ucam.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.20i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.23
Sender: Colin Watson <cjwatson@arborlon.riva.ucam.org>
X-BadReturnPath: cjwatson@arborlon.riva.ucam.org rewritten as cjw44@flatline.org.uk
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: quickppp
Version: 1.2.0-1.1
Severity: serious

Hi,

quickppp recommends pppd, which doesn't exist. Do you mean ppp (which
contains /usr/sbin/pppd)?

Thanks,

-- 
Colin Watson                                  [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 109409-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Apr 2002 04:35:04 +0000
>From mvela@public.srce.hr Wed Apr 17 23:35:04 2002
Return-path: <mvela@public.srce.hr>
Received: from jagor.srce.hr [161.53.2.130] (root)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16y3dQ-0006yg-00; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 23:35:04 -0500
Received: (from root@localhost)
	by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.3/8.9.3) id GAA07287
	for 109409-done@bugs.debian.org; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 06:34:52 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from fuzz (mail@a207.cmu.carnet.hr [193.198.129.87])
	by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA07208
	for <109409-done@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 06:34:29 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mvela by fuzz with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 16y3ar-0000R6-00
	for <109409-done@bugs.debian.org>; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 06:32:25 +0200
From: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>
To: 109409-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Fixed in quickppp 1.2.0-1.2
Date: 17 Apr 2002 22:34:59 +0200
Message-ID: <87bsci3vyk.fsf@public.srce.hr>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Lines: 11
Sender: Matej Vela <mvela@public.srce.hr>
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11
Delivered-To: 109409-done@bugs.debian.org

Now that quickppp is orphaned, NMU fixed bugs can be closed.

Here is the relevant changelog entry:

  quickppp (1.2.0-1.2) unstable; urgency=low

    * Non-maintainer upload.
    * Recommend ppp rather than pppd (closes: #109409).
    * Remove user emacs settings from this changelog (lintian).

   -- Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org>  Sun, 11 Nov 2001 22:00:27 +0000


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: