[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#140557: marked as done (FTBFS: Build failure of loadwatch on i386)

Your message dated 15 Apr 2002 03:24:49 +0200
with message-id <873cxxsqhq.fsf@public.srce.hr>
and subject line Fixed in loadwatch 1.0-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2002 06:21:48 +0000
>From dancer@netfort.gr.jp Sat Mar 30 00:21:48 2002
Return-path: <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
Received: from mikilab.doshisha.ac.jp [] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16rCFH-0003fu-00; Sat, 30 Mar 2002 00:21:47 -0600
Received: from atoron (localhost [])
	by mikilab.doshisha.ac.jp (8.9.3/3.7W) with SMTP id PAA30050
	for <maintonly@bugs.debian.org>; Sat, 30 Mar 2002 15:21:16 +0900
X-Authentication-Warning: mikilab.doshisha.ac.jp: Host localhost [] claimed to be atoron
Date: Sat, 30 Mar 2002 15:19:39 +0900
From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
To: maintonly <maintonly@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: FTBFS: Build failure of loadwatch on i386
Message-Id: <20020330151939.232b84d5.dancer@netfort.gr.jp>
Organization: Netfort project
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.6.5 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-debian-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: maintonly@bugs.debian.org

Package: loadwatch
Version: 1.0-2
Severity: wishlist

loadwatch fails to build from source on i386, when doing a binary-all build.

I am just filing this bug to notify you that I failed to build your
package from source, using a very simplistic program called pbuilder.

At least debhelper is missing from build-depends field
Please add a Build-Depends field because it is very convenient for people
when rebuilding the package

Build log follows:
dpkg-buildpackage: source package is loadwatch
dpkg-buildpackage: source version is 1.0-2
dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture is i386
 fakeroot debian/rules clean
make: dh_testdir: Command not found
make: *** [clean] Error 127


dancer@debian.org  http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer

Received: (at 140557-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Apr 2002 18:15:12 +0000
>From mvela@public.srce.hr Mon Apr 15 13:15:12 2002
Return-path: <mvela@public.srce.hr>
Received: from jagor.srce.hr [] (root)
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16xB0Q-0003bm-00; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 13:15:10 -0500
Received: (from root@localhost)
	by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.3/8.9.3) id UAA20759
	for 140557-done@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 20:14:58 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from fuzz (mail@a335.cmu.carnet.hr [])
	by jagor.srce.hr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA20687
	for <140557-done@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 20:14:42 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from mvela by fuzz with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 16xAxS-0000BJ-00
	for <140557-done@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2002 20:12:06 +0200
From: Matej Vela <vela@debian.org>
To: 140557-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Fixed in loadwatch 1.0-3
Date: 15 Apr 2002 03:24:49 +0200
Message-ID: <873cxxsqhq.fsf@public.srce.hr>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Lines: 7
Sender: Matej Vela <mvela@public.srce.hr>
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11
Delivered-To: 140557-done@bugs.debian.org

Here is the relevant changelog entry:

  loadwatch (1.0-3) frozen unstable; urgency=low

    * Bringing up to current standards.

   -- Dale E Martin <dmartin@cliftonlabs.com>  Thu, 11 Apr 2002 11:37:52 -0400

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-packages-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to: