[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#115987: marked as done (kmozilla starting is slow)



Your message dated Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:52:45 +0100
with message-id <20020127225245.A27161@fisch.cyrius.com>
and subject line Package kmozilla removed from Debian unstable
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Oct 2001 16:36:16 +0000
>From daniel@desages.com Wed Oct 17 11:36:16 2001
Return-path: <daniel@desages.com>
Received: from s010.dhcp212-198-137.noos.fr (bora-bora.pacifique) [212.198.137.10] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 15ttfz-0002e3-00; Wed, 17 Oct 2001 11:36:15 -0500
Received: by bora-bora.pacifique (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 1E0914B211; Wed, 17 Oct 2001 18:43:24 +0200 (CEST)
From: daniel desages <daniel@desages.com>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: kmozilla starting is slow
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.31
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.31
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2001 18:43:24 +0200
Message-Id: <20011017164324.1E0914B211@bora-bora.pacifique>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org

Package: kmozilla
Version: 2.2.1-1.2
Severity: normal

Rendering in kmozilla is very slow when I launch it 


-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux bora-bora.pacifique 2.4.12-686 #2 Sat Oct 13 20:13:05 EST 2001 i686
Locale: LANG=fr, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.ISO-8859-15@euro

Versions of packages kmozilla depends on:
ii  libc6                  2.2.4-3           GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdcopc1              2.2.1-1.2         C bindings for DCOP
ii  libglib1.2             1.2.10-1.2        The GLib library of C routines
ii  libgtk1.2              1.2.10-2          The GIMP Toolkit set of widgets fo
ii  libkdexparts1          2.2.1-1.2         Python bindings for DCOP
ii  libnspr4               2:0.9.5-3         Netscape Portable Runtime Library
ii  libstdc++2.10-glibc2.2 1:2.95.4-0.011006 The GNU stdc++ library
ii  mozilla                2:0.9.5-3         Mozilla Web Browser - dummy packag
ii  xlibs                  4.1.0-7           X Window System client libraries


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 115987-done) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Jan 2002 21:52:57 +0000
>From tbm@cyrius.com Sun Jan 27 15:52:57 2002
Return-path: <tbm@cyrius.com>
Received: from gtso-c3477b5b.dsl.mediaways.net (mail.frosty-geek.net) [195.71.123.91] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
	id 16UxEP-0006tD-00; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 15:52:57 -0600
Received: from nautilus.noreply.org (unknown [138.232.34.77])
	by mail.frosty-geek.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E2E9F46C081; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:52:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: by nautilus.noreply.org (Postfix, from userid 10)
	id 6B341357C6; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:52:54 +0100 (CET)
Received: by fisch.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id BABD522BB2; Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:52:45 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2002 22:52:45 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>
To: 115987-done@bugs.debian.org, 126447-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Package kmozilla removed from Debian unstable
Message-ID: <20020127225245.A27161@fisch.cyrius.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22i
Delivered-To: 115987-done@bugs.debian.org

The package kmozilla has been removed from Debian unstable and won't
be released as part of the next Debian release, woody (version 3.0).
I'm therefore closing all its open bugs.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me.

Best regards,

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
tbm@cyrius.com



Reply to: