[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#128444: This *is* serious

On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 02:27:07PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> Colin Watson <cjwatson@flatline.org.uk> writes:
> > severity 128444 serious
> > thanks
> > 
> > In practice this is serious. I'll put together a fix.
> "in practice".  No.  It doesn't violate policy.  Maybe it should, but
> it doesn't.  Of course, it's fine to fix it.  But there is no rule
> that packages must not depend on such things.

Sometimes actually getting things working is more important than
worrying about which rules they violate, and I'm volunteering to get
things working. In any case, the serious severity is also for "in the
package maintainer's opinion, makes the package unsuitable for release",
and in this package maintainer's opinion a package that can't be built
by autobuilders is unsuitable.

Colin Watson                                  [cjwatson@flatline.org.uk]

Reply to: