[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Thinking of removing some QA packages



On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 06:57:54PM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote:
> xinvaders: non-free, orphaned 7 months ago from an MIA maintainer.  One
> 	"normal" (although I think by now it's probably serious, given it's
> 	an FHS bug) and a couple of wishlist bugs with patches in the BTS. 
> 	Especially since it's non-free, and hasn't had a QA upload *or* a
> 	regular upload in 2.5 years, I think it should be binned.  There's
> 	also xinv3d which does the same sort of thing anyway.
> 
> xtrojka: another non-free, 11 months orphaned, just another random game
> 	nobody seems to care about.  1 pretty important bug, 1 minor, both
> 	with patches.
> 
> figurine: main this time, with 3 pretty emphatic bugs on it (all from the
> 	same person, who knows?).  No uploads in 1.5 years, does basically
> 	the same job as xfig and dia.
> 
> qcl: 4 month old RC bug, absolutely no interest from anyone to fix it. 
> 	Nothing in twelve months.  Has an incredibly limited audience
> 	(quantum computing researchers).  Upstream says that it won't work
> 	with GCC 3.x (mentions it explicitly, so it sounds like they've had
> 	this problem before...).  It will be a pain to keep.
> 
> libdsp: orphaned from an MIA maintainer 7 months ago.  One pretty important
> 	bug outstanding, nobody cares enough to fix it.  No uploads in 2.5
> 	years, upstream has moved on considerably.
> 
> sciplot: as per libdsp, pretty much.
> 
> Didn't look at anything less than 200 days old, so that's it.
> 
> Does anyone else have any opinions on the removal of these packages?

Rip 'em out.

-- 
  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
 : :' :  http://www.debian.org/ |
 `. `'                          |
   `-             -><-          |

Attachment: pgptRGlQGxE_5.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: