Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging

To: Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org>
Cc: debian-python <debian-python@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging
From: PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 17:27:59 +0200 (CEST)
Message-id: <[🔎] 1228626381.132136101.1749655679221.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 10889998-45ef-4405-a231-bacd5fc27eeb@debian.org>
References: <[🔎] 1779402678.132016719.1749649153102.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr> <[🔎] e0bd36c3-4e1a-432d-8fb9-a2bb110a82e2@debian.org> <[🔎] 895197705.132125083.1749654653778.JavaMail.zimbra@synchrotron-soleil.fr> <[🔎] 10889998-45ef-4405-a231-bacd5fc27eeb@debian.org>

setuptools-scm is also use in order to generate the version number.

Our packaging tools are dealing with this ?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging
  - From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org>

References:
- dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging
  - From: PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr>
- Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging
  - From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org>
- Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging
  - From: PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel <frederic-emmanuel.picca@synchrotron-soleil.fr>
- Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging
  - From: Santiago Vila <sanvila@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging
Next by Date: Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging
Previous by thread: Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging
Next by thread: Re: dpkg-buildpackage vs sbuild with python packaging
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread