Re: Do we need yapps2 any more and if yes what about maintaining it in DPT?

To: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>, Debian Python <debian-python@lists.debian.org>
Cc: Package Salvaging Team <team+salvage@tracker.debian.org>
Subject: Re: Do we need yapps2 any more and if yes what about maintaining it in DPT?
From: Matthias Urlichs <smurf@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 15:09:23 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] d94c93bd-955c-4e05-a203-b83a0e000e8a@debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] aCx9z_aWASPPvOzZ@an3as.eu>
References: <[🔎] aCx9z_aWASPPvOzZ@an3as.eu>

On 20.05.25 15:04, Andreas Tille wrote:

@Matthias:  I noticed that all but one of your packages (knxd) are not
featuring Vcs fields (and knxd is not on Salsa but on Github).  If it is
your personal policy to not use Salsa that's fine and I would remove
your ID from the Bug of the Day query.

No that's not my personal policy; knxd is in fact on Salsa too, I justneed to clean up the vcs field one of these days.


Moving yapps2 to DPT is fine with me.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Do we need yapps2 any more and if yes what about maintaining it in DPT?
  - From: Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>

References:
- Do we need yapps2 any more and if yes what about maintaining it in DPT?
  - From: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>

Prev by Date: Do we need yapps2 any more and if yes what about maintaining it in DPT?
Next by Date: Re: Do we need yapps2 any more and if yes what about maintaining it in DPT?
Previous by thread: Do we need yapps2 any more and if yes what about maintaining it in DPT?
Next by thread: Re: Do we need yapps2 any more and if yes what about maintaining it in DPT?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread