Re: llvmlite, numba, and llvm versions
Hi Diane,
Thank you for working on this.
Do you have LLVM team write access? If so please help your self and
directly push the commits there. If not, please open a merge request
and I'll process it quickly.
On Tue, 2025-04-08 at 22:59 -0700, Diane Trout wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a version of llvmlite that builds against llvm-19 with 2 test
> failures that don't look to important. One of them is definitely just
> the layout of the object file changed from what was expected.
>
> I got most of the help in the comments in here:
> https://github.com/numba/llvmlite/pull/1092
>
> Additionally with some other patches I was able to get numba to build
> with this version of llvmlite and with numpy 2.2 and all it's tests
> passed on x86_64. It also got through some tests on arm64 before it
> timed out.
>
> I pushed all my changes to llvmlite to
> https://salsa.debian.org/diane/llvmlite
> at commit 17e84a9243ba92a9248e7415c84a980e0ff96886
>
> The important bit is this patch from upstream
> https://salsa.debian.org/diane/llvmlite/-/blob/master/debian/patches/llvm-19-support-pr1182.patch?ref_type=heads
> And this patch skips/expects the two failed tests
> https://salsa.debian.org/diane/llvmlite/-/blob/master/debian/patches/skip-llvm-19-broken-tests.patch?ref_type=heads
>
> I also pushed all my changes to numba for it to build with the above
> version of llvmlite and numpy 2.2
> https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/numba.git
>
> (numba should work, though I had to merge a small change to the tests
> that I forgot to push to salsa a while ago, and it's building again,
> but I'm tired and it'll take a while to run through all the tests
> again)
>
> I hope it's still not too late to get numba back in to testing.
>
> Diane
Reply to: