Re: django-fsm vs. django-fsm-2: Update or ITP?

To: Jakob Haufe <sur5r@debian.org>
Cc: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: django-fsm vs. django-fsm-2: Update or ITP?
From: Michael Fladischer <michael@fladi.at>
Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2025 17:33:14 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 3e42ceda-9d58-429a-b71c-32798c29ec1a@fladi.at>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20250405150705.13b5b85f@tizio.sur5r.net>
References: <[🔎] 20250403112529.53f2b4d7@beer> <[🔎] 687ec59b-129e-408a-b985-4293167818f9@fladi.at> <[🔎] 20250405150705.13b5b85f@tizio.sur5r.net>

Am 05.04.2025 um 15:07 schrieb Jakob Haufe:

Would you like to be added to Uploaders?

If you don't mind, yes. I will have to switch over my own projectssooner or later anyway.


Thansk,
Michael

Reply to:

References:
- django-fsm vs. django-fsm-2: Update or ITP?
  - From: Jakob Haufe <sur5r@debian.org>
- Re: django-fsm vs. django-fsm-2: Update or ITP?
  - From: Michael Fladischer <michael@fladi.at>
- Re: django-fsm vs. django-fsm-2: Update or ITP?
  - From: Jakob Haufe <sur5r@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: django-fsm vs. django-fsm-2: Update or ITP?
Next by Date: Bug#1102210: ITP: python-django-fsm-2 -- Django friendly finite state machine support
Previous by thread: Re: django-fsm vs. django-fsm-2: Update or ITP?
Next by thread: Bug#1102116: ITP: pypaperless -- Asynchronous client for interacting with Paperless-ngx API
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread