Re: Would you agree with swapping Maintainer and Uploaders in eric?
Hi Jan,
I see on the tracker that you have both set the LowNMU flag (like I did too)
and also made use of the special rule of the DPT policy discussed from [1];
that seems a bit of a contradiction to me but I have read that
it was the default behaviour of some source package templating tool
which might explain where it came from.
Would you agree to swap Maintainer & Uploader fields like proposed ?
My offer to refresh the package still stands on.
I would need this anyway for my work anyway in the coming months,
that seems like a waste of time not to share this work.
(we are currently using the bookworm .deb on buster and it justs works...)
Greetings
[0] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/python-pika
Le lun. 11 mars 2024 à 22:30, Andreas Tille <andreas@fam-tille.de> a écrit :
>
> Hi Gudjon,
>
> in case you agree with the suggested change of policy discussed on the
> debian-python mailing list[1] would you agree to set DPT as maintainer?
> If yes, I'd volunteer to do this, fix bug #1065855 and #1060736.
>
> Kind regards and thanks for working on this package
> Andreas.
>
> [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2024/02/msg00052.html
Reply to: