[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Suggesting change in DPT policy



Hi Scott,

Am Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 11:54:01PM +0000 schrieb Scott Kitterman:
> It's self-induced.  I mean if it's demotivating to have people point out that you didn't follow the policy, then you can solve that all by yourself by following the policy.  If I take your argument to its logical conclusion, all of Debian's rules can be demotivating when people ignore them, so we should get rid of them all so your feelings are safe.

I agree that it was my mistake to not follow team policy.  I should not
have done this and I apologized for this.  I should have written this
e-mail first to change a policy that does not fit my experiences in
other teams as well as what obviously several contributors consider
inappropriate.  To solve this I started this discussion and meanwhile
created a MR[1].

The demotivating part was the wording to point me to the policy.  I
addressed this with the words "I wonder whether I should propose another
change to the policy about maintaining a kind and polite language inside
the team - but that's a different thing." in my initial mail[2].

To make sure this will really clear I added the proposed change in a
second MR[3] containing the following diff:


--- a/policy.rst
+++ b/policy.rst
@@ -169,6 +169,16 @@ To be merged, a policy update needs the approval of at least one team
 administrator.
 
 
+Code of Conduct
+===============
+  
+The Debian Python team members agree to the
+`Debian Code of Conduct <https://www.debian.org/code_of_conduct>`
+and strive to create a kind and inviting atmosphere among team members.
+We are welcoming newcomers and will be open to questions to get them
+starting.
+
+


Kind regards
    Andreas.

[1] https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/-/merge_requests/20
[2] https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2024/02/msg00052.html
[3] https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/tools/python-modules/-/merge_requests/21

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


Reply to: