On Friday, August 11, 2023 10:49:00 AM EDT Stefano Rivera wrote: > My vote would be strongly towards maintaining the status quo of the > policy-defined names. > > I don't see any strong argument for changing this. Fully agreed. In addition to the reasons you listed, renaming a lot of packages would require a trip through New. I think we have enough backlog there without renaming a bunch of packages for a not very good reason. Scott K
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.