Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose

To: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose
From: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@jwilk.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2022 13:34:40 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20220826113440.ojtudv2mxiobjlgm@jwilk.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-python@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] YwItZCbz6Uw1g7Cz@mitya57.me>
References: <[🔎] YwItZCbz6Uw1g7Cz@mitya57.me>

  anorack


Fixed upstream in 0.2.8.

  mwic


Fixed upstream in 0.7.9.

  python-djvulibre


Fixed upstream in 0.8.7.

This one should probably be removed, though: there are no rev-deps, it'sorphaned in Debian, and it's likely to be orphaned upstream soon too.


--
Jakub Wilk

Reply to:

References:
- Proposed MBF: packages still using nose
  - From: Dmitry Shachnev <mitya57@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Python distributions with multiple packages
Next by Date: Re: Python distributions with multiple packages
Previous by thread: Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose
Next by thread: Re: Proposed MBF: packages still using nose
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread