Re: Help to package xdoctest
Hi Bo (2022.12.26_07:01:29_+0000)
> W: python3-xdoctest: no-manual-page [usr/bin/xdoctest]
Yeah, applications *should* have manual pages, but it's not required. If
you need more tooling to build the manpage, it can wait until those
tools are available in Debian.
> P: xdoctest source: very-long-line-length-in-source-file 563 > 512 [dev/outline.md:11]
> X: xdoctest source: debian-watch-does-not-check-openpgp-signature [debian/watch]
I'd ignore those.
> X: python3-xdoctest: application-in-library-section python [usr/bin/xdoctest]
> X: python3-xdoctest: library-package-name-for-application [usr/bin/xdoctest]
So, technically, xdoctest could be split into an xdoctest binary package
(the command) and python3-xdoctest (the library). Personally, I don't
bother to do that for niche tools like this. If it was a more
user-oriented package, then it could make more sense to split it.
SR
--
Stefano Rivera
http://tumbleweed.org.za/
+1 415 683 3272
Reply to: