Thanks for the reply. On 11/11/2022 13:49, stefanor@debian.org wrote:
Hi Jerome (2022.11.11_12:23:42_+0000)Fixing the #1020747 may avoid FTBFS for some packages. I proposed a solution to fix it, however I cannot say if it optimal.That patch looks reasonable to me. I'd have done the [:3] inside the tuple(), but that's not exactly a problem.
I will try to step forward by the end of the week-end if no one else do it before. Cheers, Jerome
SR
-- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calculus@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature