On 10/23/20 1:07 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 10/18/20 12:13 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> Python 3.9 as a supported Python3 version is now in unstable, and all binNMUs
>> are done (thanks to Graham for the work). Bug reports should be all filed for
>> all known problems [1], and the current state of the 3.9 addition can be seen at
>> [2] (a few of the "bad" are false packages with b-d n python3-all-dev, but not
>> building for 3.9, bug reports also filed).
>>
>> The major outstanding issue is the pandas stack, all other problems are found in
>> leaf packages (leaf in the sense of that no other package for the 3.9 addition
>> is blocked).
>>
>> Please help fixing the remaining issues!
>>
>> Matthias
>>
>> [1]
>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=python3.9;users=debian-python@lists.debian.org
>> [2] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python3.9.html
>
> Going on with a test rebuild of 3.9 as default to file bug reports for more
> packages. The first stage1 packages for 3.9 as default [1] can be found at
>
> deb [trusted=yes] http://people.debian.org/~doko/tmp/python3.9 ./
> deb [trusted=yes] http://people.debian.org/~ginggs/python3.9-repo ./
>
> The first repo just having the python3-defaults packages from experimental. The
> second repo of course will be outdated very soon ... Bug reports for stage1 are
> filed, Graham is now running the test builds for stage2.
>
> The autopkg test results at [2] need checking. There's currently a britney bug
> which marks things as bad, and only gets it right after a week. Plus there's no
> way to select an "unrelated" package from unstable for a test, and have it
> marked as a successful test. So basically you need to wait until all the 3.9
> related fixes migrate to testing for running a successful autopkg test.
>
> Matthias
>
> [1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python3.9-default.html
> [2] https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/python3-defaults
- python3-defaults now migrated to testing. The following packages were
removed from testing with fastened hints.
numba
python-executing
python-fabio
python-icecream
python-molotov
supysonic
- The Python related ftbfs issues from the last archive test rebuild
were user-tagged with 'python3.9', although I didn't make much
effort to determine if these are ftbfs seen for 3.9 only, or for
both 3.8 and 3.9. dh-python now supports building and testing for
all supported python version before bailing out in case of errors,
but this came too late for the test rebuild.
issues for key packages (those with lots of dependencies) are:
https://bugs.debian.org/973056 src:sphinx-tabs
Fixed.
https://bugs.debian.org/973057 src:python-py
Fixed.
https://bugs.debian.org/973061 src:nototools
Pasted a trivial fix to the bug. I guess it could be NMUed (it's not a Python team package).
https://bugs.debian.org/973072 src:python-kubernetes
I patched the failures (see the bug) but then the build hangs for me.
https://bugs.debian.org/973087 src:python-fs
Fixed, but I forgot to put the Closes: #xxx in the changelog.
https://bugs.debian.org/973114 src:python-future
https://bugs.debian.org/973121 src:cairocffi
https://bugs.debian.org/973126 src:responses
https://bugs.debian.org/973134 src:python-webob
https://bugs.debian.org/973165 src:pyflakes
Fixed.
https://bugs.debian.org/973167 src:ufonormalizer
https://bugs.debian.org/973168 src:pylint
This looks confusing! Upstream is thinking about it but I'm not sure what their ETA is.
https://bugs.debian.org/973193 src:parso
https://bugs.debian.org/973195 src:python-asyncssh
https://bugs.debian.org/973239 src:python-fixtures
Upstream is thinking about this too.
Cheers,
mwh
For the other ftbfs, see [1].
Matthias
[1]
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=python3.9;users=debian-python@lists.debian.org