Re: Should Binaries provided by python-babel have a "python3-" prefix?
On 11/27/20 1:13 PM, Simon McVittie wrote:
> A good way to decide this is to think about what we would do if we had a
> Python 4 that is incompatible with Python 3 (which I assume will happen
> eventually, although hopefully not for a few years).
It is very likely that you're wrongly guessing. Numerous times, the
Python upstream people wrote that the py2 to py3 transition was a bad
idea, and they will not do the same kind of mistake again, and that
there probably wont be a Python 4 anytime.
Which is why I thought merging the content of python3-babel and
python3-babel-localedata would be a good idea.
Thomas Goirand (zigo)