Re: Asking for help Poetry
- To: email@example.com
- Subject: Re: Asking for help Poetry
- From: Bastian Venthur <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2020 16:15:40 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] email@example.com>
- In-reply-to: <A8748465-C0F9-4BD2-A2AD-64232ECD0654@kitterman.com>
- References: <CAFNO5odGZaFaz5VjEnS1w1efYZbnk588y47DT+YhAvzSUQvbAA@mail.gmail.com> <A8748465-C0F9-4BD2-A2AD-64232ECD0654@kitterman.com>
I see some updates on the salsa repository, any chance we can get this
package ready before the next freeze so we'll have it in the next stable
On 29.06.20 06:04, Scott Kitterman wrote:
On June 29, 2020 3:08:53 AM UTC, Emmanuel Arias <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
I'm working on poetry packaging, I created on salsa de repository .
Note that there are many packages that are not in Debian like cachy,
I RFS python-cachy  and now I'm working on cleo, which depends on
that is not on Debian (if I search correctly).
Bastian Venthur note me that pienv, pip have vendors folder with the
but looking on poetry that _vendor folder is empty.
So, looking for I more experienced opinion, do you think that we would
to upstream to make available vendors on the release (if that is
we need to package all the missing dependencies?
Definitely they should be packaged.
At least for pip none of the vendored libs are used in Debian's package. Fortunately upstream supports use of system libs with only minor patching.
Dr. Bastian Venthur http://venthur.de
Debian Developer venthur at debian org