[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Policy proposal: Consistent use of UNRELEASED in debian/changelog



On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 08:07:29PM -0400, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote:
> The problem this tries to solves is inconsistent use of UNRELEASED in
> debian/changelog. Some people do not use it at all, and it can make
> working on team packages harder.
> 
> Indeed, if you try to modify a package, if people don't use UNRELEASED,
> you first need to check if the current VCS version has been uploaded to
> the archive or not. This complicates the life of people doing mass
> updates, as they can't rely on packages with `unstable` having been
> uploaded.

I just want to point people towards the fact that the Janitor's is now
being clever about recognizing whether a package is using `gbp dch`
(which I believe is the case you refer to when you say that UNRELEASED
is not used), or changelog entires are added whenever a change is done.


That said, I acknoledge that it makes sense to converge on a single
solution for the whole team, and honestly I don't have much of a strong
preference towards either one.

-- 
regards,
                        Mattia Rizzolo

GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18  4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540      .''`.
More about me:  https://mapreri.org                             : :'  :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri                  `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia  `-

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: