On Sun, 3 Nov 2019 15:00:17 +0100 Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org> wrote: > [discussing this outside the bug report on the ML] > > On 03.11.19 14:39, Neil Williams wrote: > > Actually, that's a good catch. I was mixing up the defaults package > > with the general advice on python3 migration to not remove > > python-foo-doc just to rename it to python3-foo-doc. > > where did you read that? IMO we don't want to rename the -doc > packages. https://wiki.debian.org/Python/2Removal Check list * if documentation was in python-foo - move it to python3-foo or python-foo-doc * if it was automatically placed there by dh_installdocs, it will automatically move to python-foo-doc: you don't need to do anything, unless you had links to it that need un-breaking * do not remove python-foo-doc or rename it to python3-foo-doc > > > Removing the defaults package python-doc seems right to me. I've > > updated that paragraph. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
Attachment:
pgplaDYlFWUom.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature