Re: Matplotlib 3.0 - update ok?
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 07:55:40AM +0100, ghisvail@gmail.com wrote:
> > > I suppose the main module is still named "matplotlib" not
> > > "matplotlib3" in version 3 onwards? So using python3-matplotlib3
> > > would
> > > be a breach of policy.
> >
> > Probably.
>
> Described in Section 2.2 of the Debian Python policy.
Depending how heavy Steffen would volunteer to patch and also rename the
module (which I would not consider a very sensible idea).
> > I'm not sure what might be the difference between:
> >
> > 3.0.0 Stable version
> > 2.2.3 LTS LTS version
> >
> > We have some months left until freeze so may be right now it is not
> > to
> > late to package what upstream considers stable.
> >
> > Kind regards
> >
> > Andreas.
>
>
> >From the upstream homepage: "Matplotlib 3.0 is Python 3 only."
>
> Afaik, Python 2 is still considered relevant for the Buster release
> cycle. Hence why I am suggesting to wait for the next release cycle
> before upgrading key scientific packages, such as matplotlib, to Python
> 3 only.
Right. This would surely kick several scientific packages.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: