Re: Updated PEP 394 (python and python2 commands)
- To: debian-python@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Updated PEP 394 (python and python2 commands)
- From: Matthias Klose <doko@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 21:39:13 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 775e858e-c50e-d58b-8c94-e3b535868dc7@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <20180610115914.7ukdlli6l2d6hfig@sar0.p1otr.com>
- References: <6dc7af52-174f-04c5-9149-cc5affa8afb1@debian.org> <20180518091951.jk6gvppn7yxyx5zp@sar0.p1otr.com> <2129b34f-a837-2d14-4400-3fa44785885d@debian.org> <20180518170216.pkxk44ipymh3jspv@sar0.p1otr.com> <d44e1fc7-1b37-4127-3501-1d983cbea40d@debian.org> <20180518172417.kke4qgitz73uihog@sar0.p1otr.com> <38444031-1db5-6cda-f8c2-063580be7d30@debian.org> <pdocac$6jb$1@blaine.gmane.org> <275db62c-817f-4c06-ff31-460b589ebe96@debian.org> <20180610115914.7ukdlli6l2d6hfig@sar0.p1otr.com>
sorry, I never replied to that email.
On 10.06.2018 13:59, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
> [Matthias Klose, 2018-06-08]
>> from my point of view this doesn't address:
>>
>> - being able to de-install the python command for buster, if
>> people don't use it. Most dependencies are auto-generated, so
>> these could be replaced by dependencies on python2. I would
>> assume that the majority of users won't have to install the
>> python package anymore, unless they are doing python2
>> development.
>
> how about generating dependencies on python2.7 and moving
> pycompile/pyclean there as well (this also solves pre-dependency issue)
>
>> - Not having a python package in bullseye (buster+1), but a
>> python2 package doesn't point to any "default" anymore. Many
>> users are installing just python, because it's the unversioned
>> package. So make it clear that this is another version, and
>> with having the choice of python2 and python3, most users will
>> install python3.
>
> same here
>
> additional question: why do you need for all that python2-doc,
> python2-minimal, python2-dev, libpython2-dev, libpython2-stdlib,
> python2-dbg and libpython2-dbg binary packages?
yes, moving the symlinks to the 2.7 packages would be an option as well. But I
don't see any difference why one or the other should be the preferred option.
Reply to: