Hello, On Tue 31 Jul 2018 at 12:00AM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > On Monday, July 30 2018, Sean Whitton wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> On Mon 30 Jul 2018 at 09:54PM -0400, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >> >>> This is my understanding as well: git-dpm is not mandatory anymore, and >>> gbp is the preferred tool. I've been packaging all of my Python modules >>> using gbp for a while. >> >> Do I have to use the full suite of gbp tools (e.g. gbp-pq) or is it >> enough that `gbp buildpackage` will work? > > You don't have to use the full suite if you don't like. The important > thing is to have the repository in the correct format > (debian/upstream/pristine-tar branches [or something else, as long as > properly documented in d/gbp.conf], tags, etc.), so that other people > can use gbp without problems. Thank you. Just to note that gbp will work with patches-applied too, but I won't do that. -- Sean Whitton
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature