Re: Updated PEP 394 (python and python2 commands)
[Matthias Klose, 2018-06-08]
> from my point of view this doesn't address:
>
> - being able to de-install the python command for buster, if
> people don't use it. Most dependencies are auto-generated, so
> these could be replaced by dependencies on python2. I would
> assume that the majority of users won't have to install the
> python package anymore, unless they are doing python2
> development.
how about generating dependencies on python2.7 and moving
pycompile/pyclean there as well (this also solves pre-dependency issue)
> - Not having a python package in bullseye (buster+1), but a
> python2 package doesn't point to any "default" anymore. Many
> users are installing just python, because it's the unversioned
> package. So make it clear that this is another version, and
> with having the choice of python2 and python3, most users will
> install python3.
same here
additional question: why do you need for all that python2-doc,
python2-minimal, python2-dev, libpython2-dev, libpython2-stdlib,
python2-dbg and libpython2-dbg binary packages?
--
GPG: 1D2F A898 58DA AF62 1786 2DF7 AEF6 F1A2 A745 7645
Reply to: